121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29954589)
1. Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience.
Abdrabuh AM; Salih EM; Aboelnasr M; Galal H; El-Emam A; El-Zayat T
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Nov; 53(11):2250-2255. PubMed ID: 29954589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy.
Lam JS; Cooper KL; Greene TD; Gupta M
Urology; 2003 Jun; 61(6):1107-11; discussion 1111-2. PubMed ID: 12809872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.
Menon P; Rao KL; Sodhi KS; Bhattacharya A; Saxena AK; Mittal BR
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):80.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25794866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: national trends and comparative effectiveness in operative outcomes.
Sukumar S; Roghmann F; Sood A; Abdo A; Menon M; Sammon JD; Sun M; Varda B; Trinh QD; Elder JS
J Endourol; 2014 May; 28(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 24372348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of Acucise endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Biyani CS; Minhas S; el Cast J; Almond DJ; Cooksey G; Hetherington JW
Eur Urol; 2002 Mar; 41(3):305-10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 12180233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Delayed redo pyeloplasty fails to recover lost renal function after failed pyeloplasty: early sonographic changes that correlate with a loss of differential renal function.
Chung DY; Hong CH; Im YJ; Lee YS; Kim SW; Han SW
Korean J Urol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 25685304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical analysis of outcome after open dismembered pyeloplasty in ectopic pelvic kidneys in a pediatric cohort.
Helmy TE; Sarhan OM; Sharaf DE; Shalaby I; Harraz AM; Hafez AT; Dawaba ME
Urology; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1357-60. PubMed ID: 23102440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term functional and morphological outcome after pyeloplasty for huge renal pelvis.
Sarhan O; Helmy T; Abou-El Ghar M; Baky MA; El-Assmy A; Dawaba M
BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):829-833. PubMed ID: 20735380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy.
Hoenig DM; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; McDougall EM; Smith D; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 1998 Apr; 12(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 9607438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following salvage intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Crivelli JJ; Johnson BA; Steinberg RL; Gahan JC; Antonelli JA; Morey AF; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA
Int Braz J Urol; 2021; 47(6):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 34469674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endopyelotomy review.
Bernardo N; Smith AD
Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of percutaneous endopyelotomy in the treatment of children with failed open pyeloplasty.
Capolicchio G; Homsy YL; Houle AM; Brzezinski A; Stein L; Elhilali MM
J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1534-7. PubMed ID: 9302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy: a single-center experience.
Matin SF; Yost A; Streem SB
J Endourol; 2003 Aug; 17(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 12965067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction - a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy.
Vannahme M; Mathur S; Davenport K; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
BJU Int; 2014 Jan; 113(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 24053370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
