These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29955203)
1. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Vu D; Groenewald M; de Vries M; Gehrmann T; Stielow B; Eberhardt U; Al-Hatmi A; Groenewald JZ; Cardinali G; Houbraken J; Boekhout T; Crous PW; Robert V; Verkley GJM Stud Mycol; 2019 Mar; 92():135-154. PubMed ID: 29955203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA barcoding analysis of more than 9 000 yeast isolates contributes to quantitative thresholds for yeast species and genera delimitation. Vu D; Groenewald M; Szöke S; Cardinali G; Eberhardt U; Stielow B; de Vries M; Verkleij GJ; Crous PW; Boekhout T; Robert V Stud Mycol; 2016 Sep; 85():91-105. PubMed ID: 28050055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of sequencing the D2 region of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (MicroSEQ®) versus the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions using two public databases for identification of common and uncommon clinically relevant fungal species. Arbefeville S; Harris A; Ferrieri P J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Sep; 140():40-46. PubMed ID: 28647582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metabarcoding of insect-associated fungal communities: a comparison of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large-subunit (LSU) rRNA markers. Ceballos-Escalera A; Richards J; Arias MB; Inward DJG; Vogler AP MycoKeys; 2022; 88():1-33. PubMed ID: 35585929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dnabarcoder: An open-source software package for analysing and predicting DNA sequence similarity cutoffs for fungal sequence identification. Vu D; Nilsson RH; Verkley GJM Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2793-2809. PubMed ID: 35621380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When barcoding fails: Genome chimerization (admixing) and reticulation obscure phylogenetic and taxonomic relationships. Sipiczki M Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Jul; 22(5):1762-1785. PubMed ID: 35060340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metataxonomic comparison between internal transcribed spacer and 26S ribosomal large subunit (LSU) rDNA gene. Mota-Gutierrez J; Ferrocino I; Rantsiou K; Cocolin L Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 290():132-140. PubMed ID: 30340111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Schoch CL; Seifert KA; Huhndorf S; Robert V; Spouge JL; Levesque CA; Chen W; ; Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Apr; 109(16):6241-6. PubMed ID: 22454494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA barcoding and species delimitation of butterflies (Lepidoptera) from Nigeria. Nneji LM; Adeola AC; Ayoola AO; Oladipo SO; Wang YY; Malann YD; Anyaele O; Nneji IC; Rahman MM; Olory CS Mol Biol Rep; 2020 Dec; 47(12):9441-9457. PubMed ID: 33200313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skimming for barcodes: rapid production of mitochondrial genome and nuclear ribosomal repeat reference markers through shallow shotgun sequencing. Hoban ML; Whitney J; Collins AG; Meyer C; Murphy KR; Reft AJ; Bemis KE PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13790. PubMed ID: 35959477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconsideration of species boundaries and proposed DNA barcodes for Liu QL; Li JQ; Wingfield MJ; Duong TA; Wingfield BD; Crous PW; Chen SF Stud Mycol; 2020 Sep; 97():100106. PubMed ID: 34322181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring Genetic Divergence in a Species-Rich Insect Genus Using 2790 DNA Barcodes. Lin X; Stur E; Ekrem T PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138993. PubMed ID: 26406595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS, sequencing of D2 LSU rRNA and internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS) for the identification of filamentous fungi isolated from a pharmaceutical facility. Moreira FM; Pereira PA; Miranda RVDSL; Reis CMFD; Braga LMPDS; de Andrade JM; do Nascimento LG; Mattoso JMV; Forsythe SJ; da Costa LV; Brandão MLL J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2023 Sep; 234():115531. PubMed ID: 37354630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longer is Not Always Better: Optimizing Barcode Length for Large-Scale Species Discovery and Identification. Yeo D; Srivathsan A; Meier R Syst Biol; 2020 Sep; 69(5):999-1015. PubMed ID: 32065638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Figures of merit and statistics for detecting faulty species identification with DNA barcodes: A case study in Ramaria and related fungal genera. Martín MP; Daniëls PP; Erickson D; Spouge JL PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237507. PubMed ID: 32813726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two new computational methods for universal DNA barcoding: a benchmark using barcode sequences of bacteria, archaea, animals, fungi, and land plants. Tanabe AS; Toju H PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76910. PubMed ID: 24204702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of ITS and sub-regions as DNA barcode markers for the identification of Basidiomycota (Fungi). Badotti F; de Oliveira FS; Garcia CF; Vaz AB; Fonseca PL; Nahum LA; Oliveira G; Góes-Neto A BMC Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28228107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The D1-D2 region of the large subunit ribosomal DNA as barcode for ciliates. Stoeck T; Przybos E; Dunthorn M Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 May; 14(3):458-68. PubMed ID: 24165195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA barcode data accurately assign higher spider taxa. Coddington JA; Agnarsson I; Cheng RC; Čandek K; Driskell A; Frick H; Gregorič M; Kostanjšek R; Kropf C; Kweskin M; Lokovšek T; Pipan M; Vidergar N; Kuntner M PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2201. PubMed ID: 27547527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]