294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29955262)
1. Seismic vulnerability assessment to earthquake at urban scale: A case of Mostaganem city in Algeria.
Chaibedra B; Benanane A; Boutaraa Z
Jamba; 2018; 10(1):473. PubMed ID: 29955262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Post-earthquake damage classification and assessment: case study of the residential buildings after the
Mouloud H; Chaker A; Nassim H; Lebdioui S; Rodrigues H; Agius MR
Bull Earthq Eng; 2023; 21(2):849-891. PubMed ID: 36466195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.
Romero-Sánchez E; Morales-Esteban A; Requena-García-Cruz MV; Zapico-Blanco B; de-Miguel-Rodríguez J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238505. PubMed ID: 32915839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of Shape Memory Alloys in Retrofitting of Masonry and Heritage Structures Based on Their Vulnerability Revealed in the Bam 2003 Earthquake.
Tabrizikahou A; Hadzima-Nyarko M; Kuczma M; Lozančić S
Materials (Basel); 2021 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 34443003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings using the rough set theory and weighted linear combination.
Asadi Y; Neysani Samany N; Kiavarz Moqadam M; Abdollahi Kakroodi A; Argany M
J Mt Sci; 2022; 19(3):849-861. PubMed ID: 35222554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses.
Kassem MM; Mohamed Nazri F; Noroozinejad Farsangi E
MethodsX; 2019; 6():199-211. PubMed ID: 30766800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mexico City during and after the September 19, 2017 earthquake: Assessment of seismic resilience and ongoing recovery process.
Tena-Colunga A; Hernández-Ramírez H; Godínez-Domínguez EA; Pérez-Rocha LE
J Civ Struct Health Monit; 2021; 11(5):1275-1299. PubMed ID: 34367862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Bantul regency, Indonesia.
Aulady MFN; Fujimi T
Jamba; 2019; 11(1):756. PubMed ID: 31308882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The M
Atalić J; Uroš M; Šavor Novak M; Demšić M; Nastev M
Bull Earthq Eng; 2021; 19(9):3461-3489. PubMed ID: 35210984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Seismic and Restoration Assessment of Monumental Masonry Structures.
Asteris PG; Douvika MG; Apostolopoulou M; Moropoulou A
Materials (Basel); 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28767073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings with different heights and floor systems.
Abd-Elhamed A; Mahmoud S; Alotaibi KS
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14949. PubMed ID: 37697013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Earthquake insurance pricing: a risk-based approach.
Lin JH
Disasters; 2018 Apr; 42(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 28543429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Technological System for Post-Earthquake Damage Scenarios Based on the Monitoring by Means of an Urban Seismic Network.
Costanzo A; Falcone S; D'Alessandro A; Vitale G; Giovinazzi S; Morici M; Dall'Asta A; Buongiorno MF
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34883889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and present status of seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Japan.
Okada T
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2021; 97(7):402-422. PubMed ID: 34380916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seismic Protection of RC Buildings by Polymeric Infill Wall-Frame Interface.
Akyildiz AT; Kowalska-Koczwara A; Hojdys Ł
Polymers (Basel); 2021 May; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 34069131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of injury pattern and entrapment location inside damaged buildings in the 2016 Taiwan earthquake.
Pan ST; Cheng YY; Wu CL; Chang RH; Chiu C; Foo NP; Chen PT; Wang TY; Chen LH; Chen CJ; Ong R; Tsai CC; Hsu CC; Hsieh LW; Chi CH; Lin CH
J Formos Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 118(1 Pt 2):311-323. PubMed ID: 29857951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Earthquake Damage Visualization (EDV) Technique for the Rapid Detection of Earthquake-Induced Damages Using SAR Data.
Sharma RC; Tateishi R; Hara K; Nguyen HT; Gharechelou S; Nguyen LV
Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 28134796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal seismic retrofitting techniques for URM school buildings located in the southwestern Iberian peninsula.
Segovia-Verjel ML; Requena-García-Cruz MV; de-Justo-Moscardó E; Morales-Esteban A
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223491. PubMed ID: 31618221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field reconnaissance and structural assessment of the October 30, 2020, Samos, Aegean Sea earthquake: an example of severe damage due to the basin effect.
Onat O; Yön B; Öncü ME; Varolgüneş S; Karaşin A; Cemalgil S
Nat Hazards (Dordr); 2022; 112(1):75-117. PubMed ID: 35095193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
