These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29955806)

  • 1. The Limits and Hazards of Clinical Equipoise on Cardiology Study Design and Conduct.
    Miller FG; Dickert NW
    JAMA Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 3(9):791-792. PubMed ID: 29955806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dispensing with equipoise.
    Miller FG
    Am J Med Sci; 2011 Oct; 342(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 21804362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical equipoise and risk-benefit assessment.
    Miller FG
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 22777654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a medicolegal approach in clinical stalemates.
    Tang M
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Nov; 38(11):645-6. PubMed ID: 22923440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equipoise, research stalemates, and the limits of new data.
    London AJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 21337268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical equipoise: actual or hypothetical disagreement?
    Gelfand S
    J Med Philos; 2013 Dec; 38(6):590-604. PubMed ID: 23878347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equipoise abandoned? Randomization and clinical trials.
    Kurzrock R; Stewart DJ
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):2471-2474. PubMed ID: 24072520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theorist's Toy: Equipoise.
    Kronish DP; Penson RT
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2015 Jul; 13(7):936-8. PubMed ID: 26150585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equipoise and the dilemma of randomized clinical trials.
    Miller FG; Joffe S
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Feb; 364(5):476-80. PubMed ID: 21288100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The social function of clinical equipoise.
    Kimmelman J
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):630-1. PubMed ID: 23060321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equipoise, ethics, and the necessity of randomized trials in surgery.
    Adibe OO; St Peter SD
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):899-900. PubMed ID: 23070406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to open peer commentaries on "What is the best standard for the standard of care in clinical research?".
    van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):W7-8. PubMed ID: 19998101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is anything lost if we give up clinical equipoise?
    Miller FG
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):632-3. PubMed ID: 23060322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On what we will lose in giving up on clinical equipoise: A reply to Miller.
    van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):628-9. PubMed ID: 23060320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overinterpreting equipoise.
    Menikoff J
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 21337269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical equipoise and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials].
    Catalá-López F; González-Bermejo D; de la Fuente Honrubia C; Macías Saint-Gerons D
    Med Clin (Barc); 2015 Dec; 145(11):496-8. PubMed ID: 26004273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are more trials really the answer? Putting behavioral equipoise in check.
    Crites J
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 21337271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavior equipoise: is it ready for prime time?
    Wasson K
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 21337270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the utility and distinctness of the concept of behavioral equipoise.
    Blumenthal-Barby JS
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):9-10. PubMed ID: 21337267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Many randomized clinical trials may not be justified: a cross-sectional analysis of the ethics and science of randomized clinical trials.
    De Meulemeester J; Fedyk M; Jurkovic L; Reaume M; Dowlatshahi D; Stotts G; Shamy M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():20-25. PubMed ID: 29306063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.