These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29956256)

  • 1. Nanoscale Dynamics and Energetics of Proteins and Protein-Nucleic Acid Complexes in Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Gorle S; Vuković L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1814():579-592. PubMed ID: 29956256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refinement of Generalized Born Implicit Solvation Parameters for Nucleic Acids and Their Complexes with Proteins.
    Nguyen H; Pérez A; Bermeo S; Simmerling C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Aug; 11(8):3714-28. PubMed ID: 26574454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting RNA Duplex Dimerization Free-Energy Changes upon Mutations Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Sakuraba S; Asai K; Kameda T
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2015 Nov; 6(21):4348-51. PubMed ID: 26722970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advances in biomolecular simulations: methodology and recent applications.
    Norberg J; Nilsson L
    Q Rev Biophys; 2003 Aug; 36(3):257-306. PubMed ID: 15029826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Predicted Protein-Protein Complexes by Binding Free Energy Simulations.
    Siebenmorgen T; Zacharias M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):2071-2086. PubMed ID: 30698954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Force field validation for nucleic acid simulations: comparing energies and dynamics of a DNA dodecamer.
    Jha S; Coveney PV; Laughton CA
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Nov; 26(15):1617-27. PubMed ID: 16170796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular recognition of RNA: challenges for modelling interactions and plasticity.
    Fulle S; Gohlke H
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 19941322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure and thermodynamics of RNA-protein binding: using molecular dynamics and free energy analyses to calculate the free energies of binding and conformational change.
    Reyes CM; Kollman PA
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Apr; 297(5):1145-58. PubMed ID: 10764579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to Run FAST Simulations.
    Zimmerman MI; Bowman GR
    Methods Enzymol; 2016; 578():213-25. PubMed ID: 27497168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symmetrization of the backbone of nucleic acids: a molecular dynamics study.
    Pant P; Pathak A; Jayaram B
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2020 Feb; 38(3):673-681. PubMed ID: 30821653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced sampling and free energy calculations for protein simulations.
    Liao Q
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2020; 170():177-213. PubMed ID: 32145945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein surface roughness accounts for binding free energy of Plasmepsin II-ligand complexes.
    Valdés-Tresanco ME; Valdés-Tresanco MS; Valiente PA; Cocho G; Mansilla R; Nieto-Villar JM
    J Mol Recognit; 2018 Jan; 31(1):. PubMed ID: 28895236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refining evERdock: Improved selection of good protein-protein complex models achieved by MD optimization and use of multiple conformations.
    Shinobu A; Takemura K; Matubayasi N; Kitao A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Nov; 149(19):195101. PubMed ID: 30466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to understand atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of RNA and protein-RNA complexes?
    Šponer J; Krepl M; Banáš P; Kührová P; Zgarbová M; Jurečka P; Havrila M; Otyepka M
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA; 2017 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 27863061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of ligand-nucleic acid binding free energies with the generalized-born model in DOCK.
    Kang X; Shafer RH; Kuntz ID
    Biopolymers; 2004 Feb; 73(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 14755577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulations of the molecular dynamics of nucleic acids.
    Auffinger P; Westhof E
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 1998 Apr; 8(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 9631298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating receptor flexibility in the molecular design of protein interfaces.
    Li L; Liang S; Pilcher MM; Meroueh SO
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):575-86. PubMed ID: 19643976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coarse-grained versus atomistic simulations: realistic interaction free energies for real proteins.
    May A; Pool R; van Dijk E; Bijlard J; Abeln S; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 24273239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions.
    Wang W; Donini O; Reyes CM; Kollman PA
    Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct; 2001; 30():211-43. PubMed ID: 11340059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Net charge changes in the calculation of relative ligand-binding free energies via classical atomistic molecular dynamics simulation.
    Reif MM; Oostenbrink C
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Jan; 35(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 24249099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.