142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29956344)
1. Body mass index, facial width-to-height ratio, and perceived formidability in female Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) fighters.
Palmer-Hague JL; Twele AC; Fuller AJ
Aggress Behav; 2018 Nov; 44(6):553-560. PubMed ID: 29956344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Further evidence for links between facial width-to-height ratio and fighting success: Commentary on Zilioli et al. (2014).
Třebický V; Fialová J; Kleisner K; Roberts SC; Little AC; Havlíček J
Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 25236530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability.
Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV
Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.
Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits.
Costa M; Lio G; Gomez A; Sirigu A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172739. PubMed ID: 28235081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer.
Lieberz KA; Windmann S; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Mueller-Engelmann M; Gruener F; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Steil R
Aggress Behav; 2017 Sep; 43(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 28261811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts fighting success: A direct replication and extension of Zilioli et al. (2014).
Caton NR; Hannan J; Dixson BJW
Aggress Behav; 2022 Sep; 48(5):449-465. PubMed ID: 35262921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters.
Trebicky V; Havlícek J; Roberts SC; Little AC; Kleisner K
Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1664-72. PubMed ID: 23818656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.
Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS
Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The face-time continuum: lifespan changes in facial width-to-height ratio impact aging-associated perceptions.
Hehman E; Leitner JB; Freeman JB
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1624-36. PubMed ID: 25278108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness.
Summersby S; Harris B; Denson TF; White D
R Soc Open Sci; 2022 May; 9(5):211500. PubMed ID: 35592758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity.
Deska JC; Lloyd EP; Hugenberg K
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 114(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 28846003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.
Hodges-Simeon CR; Albert G; Richardson GB; McHale TS; Weinberg SM; Gurven M; Gaulin SJC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0240284. PubMed ID: 33711068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.
Goetz SM; Shattuck KS; Miller RM; Campbell JA; Lozoya E; Weisfeld GE; Carré JM
Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 24068116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with women's sexual desire.
Zhang W; Hahn AC; Cai Z; Lee AJ; Holzleitner IJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200308. PubMed ID: 30020967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Men's facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.
Haselhuhn MP; Ormiston ME; Wong EM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122637. PubMed ID: 25849992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Sex Drive, Sociosexuality, and Intended Infidelity.
Arnocky S; Carré JM; Bird BM; Moreau BJP; Vaillancourt T; Ortiz T; Marley N
Arch Sex Behav; 2018 Jul; 47(5):1375-1385. PubMed ID: 28929303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age similarities in recognizing threat from faces and diagnostic cues.
Boshyan J; Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG; McCormick CM; Carré JM
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 Sep; 69(5):710-8. PubMed ID: 23743626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Force versus fury: Sex differences in the relationships among physical and psychological threat potential, the facial width-to-height ratio, and judgements of aggressiveness.
MacDonell ET; Geniole SN; McCormick CM
Aggress Behav; 2018 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 29878380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facial width-to-height ratio relates to dominance style in the genus Macaca.
Borgi M; Majolo B
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1775. PubMed ID: 27019780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
