These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29956596)

  • 1. Responding to Richard: Celebrity and (mis)representation of science.
    Johnson DR; Ecklund EH; Di D; Matthews KRW
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jul; 27(5):535-549. PubMed ID: 29956596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Dawkins effect? Celebrity scientists, (non)religious publics and changed attitudes to evolution.
    Unsworth A; Voas D
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 May; 30(4):434-454. PubMed ID: 33632025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists' public scholarship.
    Bao L; Calice MN; Brossard D; Beets B; Scheufele DA; Rose KM
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Feb; 32(2):124-142. PubMed ID: 35652301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach.
    Ecklund EH; James SA; Lincoln AE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36240. PubMed ID: 22590526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of science popularizers on the public's view of religion and science: An experimental assessment.
    Scheitle CP; Ecklund EH
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Jan; 26(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 26055875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting scientists' participation in public life.
    Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secularism in science: The role of religious affiliation in assessments of scientists' trustworthiness.
    Beauchamp AL; Rios K
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Feb; 29(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 31778102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On being a (modern) scientist: risks of public engagement in the UK interspecies embryo debate.
    Porter J; Williams C; Wainwright S; Cribb A
    New Genet Soc; 2012 Dec; 31(4):408-423. PubMed ID: 23293548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientists and religious leaders compete for cultural authority of science.
    Scheitle CP; Johnson DR; Ecklund EH
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jan; 27(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 28699837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Framing Celebrity Scientists: How Chinese Media and Public Construct Celebrity-Based Risk Communication in Public Health Emergencies.
    Yu X; Wang J
    Health Commun; 2024 Apr; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 38629476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists' political behaviors are not driven by individual-level government benefits.
    Zhang B; Mildenberger M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0230961. PubMed ID: 32374737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication.
    Valinciute A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32126899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication.
    Rose KM; Markowitz EM; Brossard D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(3):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 31911470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When Genetics Meets Religion: What Scientists and Religious Leaders Can Learn from Each Other.
    Modell SM; Citrin T; Burmeister M; Kardia SLR; Beil A; Raisky J;
    Public Health Genomics; 2019; 22(5-6):174-188. PubMed ID: 31801151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
    Yamamoto YT
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.