BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29956870)

  • 1. Satisfaction rate at 1-year follow-up in patients treated with penile implants: data from the multicentre prospective registry INSIST-ED.
    Capogrosso P; Pescatori E; Caraceni E; Mondaini N; Utizi L; Cai T; Salonia A; Palmieri A; Deho' F
    BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):360-366. PubMed ID: 29956870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Chierigo F; Capogrosso P; Dehò F; Pozzi E; Schifano N; Belladelli F; Montorsi F; Salonia A
    J Sex Med; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis.
    Carlos EC; Nosé BD; Barton GJ; Davis L; Lentz AC
    J Sex Med; 2020 Nov; 17(11):2307-2310. PubMed ID: 32811792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which patient may benefit the most from penile prosthesis implantation?
    La Croce G; Schifano N; Pescatori E; Caraceni E; Colombo F; Bettocchi C; Carrino M; Vitarelli A; Pozza D; Fiordelise S; Varvello F; Paradiso M; Silvani M; Mondaini N; Natali A; Falcone M; Ceruti C; Salonia A; Antonini G; Cai T; Palmieri A; Dehò F; Capogrosso P
    Andrology; 2022 Nov; 10(8):1567-1574. PubMed ID: 36088578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis (QoLSPP): to what extent does the implant affect the patient's life?
    Caraceni E; Utizi L
    J Sex Med; 2014 Apr; 11(4):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 24548771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. INSIST-ED: Italian Society of Andrology registry on penile prosthesis surgery. First data analysis.
    Pescatori E; Alei G; Antonini G; Avolio A; Bettocchi C; Bitelli M; Boezio F; Cai T; Caraceni E; Carrino M; Colombo F; Conti E; Corvasce A; Dehò F; Fiordelise S; Ghidini N; Italiano E; La Pera G; Liguori G; Maretti C; Mondaini N; Natali A; Negro C; Palmieri A; Palumbo F; Paradiso M; Polito M; Pozza D; Silvani M; Tamai A; Timpano M; Utizi L; Varvello F; Vicini P; Vitarelli A; Franco G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Jul; 88(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 27377088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Manfredi C; Russo GI; Capogrosso P; Falcone M; Capece M; Sokolakis I; Verze P; Salonia A; Tsambarlis P; Seligra Lopes L; Romero-Otero J; DE Sio M; Levine L;
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2024 Apr; 76(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 37795696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
    Çayan S; Aşcı R; Efesoy O; Bolat MS; Akbay E; Yaman Ö
    J Sex Med; 2019 Jul; 16(7):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 31155387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study and literature review.
    Di Pierro GB; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Grande P; Frisenda M; Del Giudice F; Antonini G; Nardi F; De Berardinis E; Cristini C; Franco G; Sciarra A; Salciccia S
    Andrology; 2024 Mar; 12(3):624-632. PubMed ID: 37452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.
    Grande P; Antonini G; Cristini C; De Berardinis E; Gatto A; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Gentile G; Di Pierro GB
    World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1167-1174. PubMed ID: 29492584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Penile prosthesis implantation in Chinese patients with severe erectile dysfunction: 10-year experience.
    Song WD; Yuan YM; Cui WS; Wu AK; Zhu YC; Liu J; Wang L; Bai GY; Peng J; Zhang ZC; Gao B; Guo YL; Lue TF; Xin ZC
    Asian J Androl; 2013 Sep; 15(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 23872664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis in men who have sex with men are high.
    La J; Loeb CA; Barham DW; Miller J; Chung E; Gross MS; Hatzichristodoulou G; Park SH; Perito PE; Suarez-Sarmiento A; Van Renterghem K; Yafi FA
    Int J Impot Res; 2023 Sep; 35(6):564-568. PubMed ID: 35941220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.
    Akdemir F; Okulu E; Kayıgil Ö
    Int J Impot Res; 2017 Sep; 29(5):184-188. PubMed ID: 28424506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of unfavorable outcomes after penile prosthesis implantation - results from a national registry (INSIST-ED).
    Preto M; Falcone M; Plamadeala N; Schifano N; Bettocchi C; Colombo F; Fiordelise S; Vitarelli A; Silvani M; Mondaini N; Paradiso M; Ceruti C; Varvello F; Palumbo F; Avolio A; Antonini G; Corvasce A; Pozza D; Franco G; Bitelli M; Boezio F; Conti E; Caraceni E; Negro C; Carrino M; Vicini P; Ghidini N; Alei G; Italiano E; Timpano M; Polito M; Natali A; Tamai A; Pescatori E; Dehò F; Gideon B; Gontero P; Palmieri A; Capogrosso P
    Int J Impot Res; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37907669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why Are Men Satisfied or Dissatisfied with Penile Implants? A Mixed Method Study on Satisfaction with Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
    Carvalheira A; Santana R; Pereira NM
    J Sex Med; 2015 Dec; 12(12):2474-80. PubMed ID: 26639576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective multicentric international study on the surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction rates of the 'sliding' technique for end-stage Peyronie's disease with severe shortening of the penis and erectile dysfunction.
    Rolle L; Falcone M; Ceruti C; Timpano M; Sedigh O; Ralph DJ; Kuehhas F; Oderda M; Preto M; Sibona M; Gillo A; Garaffa G; Gontero P; Frea B
    BJU Int; 2016 May; 117(5):814-20. PubMed ID: 26688436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.
    Bozkurt IH; Arslan B; Yonguc T; Kozacıoglu Z; Degirmenci T; Gunlusoy B; Minareci S
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 26200547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the patient's satisfaction underwent penile prosthesis; Malleable versus Ambicor: Single center experience.
    Bayrak O; Erturhan S; Seckiner I; Ozturk M; Sen H; Erbagci A
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):25-29. PubMed ID: 32255323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Quality of Life After Inflatable Penile Implantation and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postsurgery Patient Satisfaction.
    Luna E; Rodriguez D; Barrios D; Hernandez H; Bianco F; Gheiler E
    J Sex Med; 2022 Sep; 19(9):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 35933304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.