These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29957107)

  • 1. Estimating a Preference-Based Single Index Measuring the Quality-of-Life Impact of Self-Management for Diabetes.
    Rowen D; Labeit A; Stevens K; Elliott J; Mulhern B; Carlton J; Basarir H; Brazier J
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 29957107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment Involving Cost to Value a Classification System Measuring the Quality-of-Life Impact of Self-Management for Diabetes.
    Rowen D; Stevens K; Labeit A; Elliott J; Mulhern B; Carlton J; Basarir H; Ratcliffe J; Brazier J
    Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 29304943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valuing the SF-6Dv2 Classification System in the United Kingdom Using a Discrete-choice Experiment With Duration.
    Mulhern BJ; Bansback N; Norman R; Brazier J;
    Med Care; 2020 Jun; 58(6):566-573. PubMed ID: 32221100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.
    Ratcliffe J; Flynn T; Terlich F; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating a Dutch Value Set for the Pediatric Preference-Based CHU9D Using a Discrete Choice Experiment with Duration.
    Rowen D; Mulhern B; Stevens K; Vermaire JH
    Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1234-1242. PubMed ID: 30314625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing preference-based measures for diabetes: DHP-3D and DHP-5D.
    Mulhern B; Labeit A; Rowen D; Knowles E; Meadows K; Elliott J; Brazier J
    Diabet Med; 2017 Sep; 34(9):1264-1275. PubMed ID: 28477411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for People With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy From the DMD-QoL.
    Rowen D; Powell P; Mukuria C; Carlton J; Norman R; Brazier J
    Value Health; 2021 Oct; 24(10):1499-1510. PubMed ID: 34593174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.
    Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Van Hout B
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):328-40. PubMed ID: 25398621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.
    Rogers HJ; Sagabiel J; Marshman Z; Rodd HD; Rowen D
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Feb; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 35115013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS
    Dewitt B; Feeny D; Fischhoff B; Cella D; Hays RD; Hess R; Pilkonis PA; Revicki DA; Roberts MS; Tsevat J; Yu L; Hanmer J
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):683-698. PubMed ID: 29944456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating a Preference-Based Index for Mental Health From the Recovering Quality of Life Measure: Valuation of Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.
    Keetharuth AD; Rowen D; Bjorner JB; Brazier J
    Value Health; 2021 Feb; 24(2):281-290. PubMed ID: 33518035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D.
    Norman R; Mercieca-Bebber R; Rowen D; Brazier JE; Cella D; Pickard AS; Street DJ; Viney R; Revicki D; King MT;
    Health Econ; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1385-1401. PubMed ID: 31482619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Norman R; Viney R; Brazier J; Burgess L; Cronin P; King M; Ratcliffe J; Street D
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):773-86. PubMed ID: 24025661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol.
    Hettiarachchi R; Kularatna S; Byrnes J; Mulhern B; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e038626. PubMed ID: 33087374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.
    Hanmer J; Cherepanov D; Palta M; Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Fryback DG
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 26314728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the psychometric properties and refinement of the Health and Self-Management in Diabetes Questionnaire (HASMID).
    Carlton J; Rowen D; Elliott J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):59. PubMed ID: 32138742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PROM Validation Using Paper-Based or Online Surveys: Data Collection Methods Affect the Sociodemographic and Health Profile of the Sample.
    Rowen D; Carlton J; Elliott J
    Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):845-850. PubMed ID: 31426923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension (FACT-8D), a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived From the Cancer-Specific FACT-General (FACT-G) Quality of Life Questionnaire: Development and Australian Value Set.
    King MT; Norman R; Mercieca-Bebber R; Costa DSJ; McTaggart-Cowan H; Peacock S; Janda M; Müller F; Viney R; Pickard AS; Cella D;
    Value Health; 2021 Jun; 24(6):862-873. PubMed ID: 34119085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.