These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29957511)

  • 1. The utility of elliptical Fourier analysis for estimating ancestry and sex from lateral skull photographs.
    Caple JM; Byrd JE; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():352-362. PubMed ID: 29957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photo-Realistic Statistical Skull Morphotypes: New Exemplars for Ancestry and Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology.
    Caple J; Stephan CN
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):562-572. PubMed ID: 27907240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative Sex Estimation Based on Cranial Traits Using R Functions.
    Nikita E
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):175-180. PubMed ID: 29856889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
    DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis.
    Guyomarc'h P; Bruzek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):180.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21482050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Morphometric Outline Analysis of Ancestry and Sex Differences in Cranial Shape.
    Murphy RE; Garvin HM
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 29193064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ancestry assessment using random forest modeling.
    Hefner JT; Spradley MK; Anderson B
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 24502438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Macromorphoscopic trait expression in a cranial sample from Medellín, Colombia.
    Monsalve T; Hefner JT
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():574.e1-574.e8. PubMed ID: 27498251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced procedures for skull sex estimation using sexually dimorphic morphometric features.
    Bertsatos A; Chovalopoulou ME; Brůžek J; Bejdová Š
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1927-1937. PubMed ID: 32504147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region.
    Kimmerle EH; Ross A; Slice D
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 18279240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination.
    Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Cephalometrics Discriminate Between the Sexes in a Diverse Juvenile Sample?
    O'Donnell A; Daneshvari Berry S; Edgar HJH
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):735-740. PubMed ID: 27885665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of discriminant functions for sexing skulls from visually assessed traits applied in the Rainer Osteological Collection (Bucharest, Romania).
    Soficaru A; Constantinescu M; Culea M; Ionică C
    Homo; 2014 Dec; 65(6):464-75. PubMed ID: 25457446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the reliability of 3D-ID software in sex and ancestry estimation with a modern Greek sample.
    Bertsatos A; Christaki A; Chovalopoulou ME
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():132-137. PubMed ID: 30797158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for estimating sex using metric analysis of the scapula.
    Dabbs GR; Moore-Jansen PH
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 20002272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of sex- and ancestry-specific variation in sacral size and shape using geometric morphometrics.
    Rusk KM; Ousley SD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 Apr; 159(4):646-54. PubMed ID: 26714617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphological assessment of ancestry using cranial macromorphoscopics.
    Klales AR; Kenyhercz MW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 25047253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
    Garvin HM; Klales AR
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements.
    Spradley MK; Jantz RL
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 21210801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.