These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29958612)

  • 21. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Recognition of speech in noise and relations with suppression of otoacoustic emissions and the acoustic reflex].
    Lautenschlager L; Tochetto T; Costa MJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21340199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children.
    Boothalingam S; Allan C; Allen P; Purcell DW
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519870942. PubMed ID: 31558110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of speech babble on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Smith S; Kei J; McPherson B; Smyth V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(7):371-8. PubMed ID: 11500011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children with specific language impairment.
    Clarke EM; Ahmmed A; Parker D; Adams C
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 16518143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and standardization of Arabic words in noise test in Egyptian children.
    Abdel Rahman TT
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():1-7. PubMed ID: 29605336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Association between speech perception in noise and electrophysiological measures: an exploratory study of possible techniques to evaluate cochlear synaptopathy in humans.
    Megarbane L; Fuente A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):427-433. PubMed ID: 32003267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship between speech recognition in noise and non-speech recognition in noise test performances: Implications for central auditory processing disorders testing.
    Vermiglio AJ; Velappan K; Heeke P; Bulla E; Fang X; Bonilla E; Garner E; Skinner J
    J Commun Disord; 2019; 77():31-43. PubMed ID: 30594730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Medial olivocochlear functioning and speech perception in noise in older adults.
    Mukari SZ; Mamat WH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):328-34. PubMed ID: 18460868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory Training Effects on the Listening Skills of Children With Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Loo JH; Rosen S; Bamiou DE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 26418044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Use of the Gaps-In-Noise Test as an Index of the Enhanced Left Temporal Cortical Thinning Associated with the Transition between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.
    Iliadou VV; Bamiou DE; Sidiras C; Moschopoulos NP; Tsolaki M; Nimatoudis I; Chermak GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):463-471. PubMed ID: 28534735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of chronic noise exposure on speech-in-noise perception in the presence of normal audiometry.
    Hope AJ; Luxon LM; Bamiou DE
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Mar; 127(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 23369841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Otoacoustic emissions as cochlear function analyser in children with language disorders].
    Aguilera-Tello SA; Gutiérrez-Farfán I; Chamlati-Aguirre LE; Alatorre-Miguel E; Durand-Rivera A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2015; 66(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 25109541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory dysfunction in patients with Huntington's disease.
    Profant O; Roth J; Bureš Z; Balogová Z; Lišková I; Betka J; Syka J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 128(10):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28826025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The First Jerger Lecture. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: an index of the function of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Hurley A; Wen H
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jan; 110(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 8290299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. BioMARK as electrophysiological tool for assessing children at risk for (central) auditory processing disorders without reading deficits.
    Kumar P; Singh NK
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():54-8. PubMed ID: 25804824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG; Mallur PS; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) performance of individuals with central auditory processing disorders from 5 to 25 years of age.
    Dias KZ; Jutras B; Acrani IO; Pereira LD
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22192900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.