These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 299592)

  • 1. The influence of the guess factor on the speech reception threshold.
    Burke LE; Nerbonne MA
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 299592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Alterations of speech audiometry in presbycusis brought about by cochlear acoustic emissions].
    Bonfils P
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Aug; 17(5):207-10. PubMed ID: 3216441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of hearing improvement due to hearing aids].
    Welzl-Müller K; Sattler K
    HNO; 1985 Jun; 33(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 4030411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
    Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central masking effects on spondee threshold as a function of masker sensation level and masker sound pressure level.
    Martin FN; Digiovanni D
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 422425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the cross hearing of spondaic words.
    Martin FN; Blythe ME
    J Aud Res; 1977 Oct; 17(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 617811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of procedures and materials for speech reception thresholds.
    Robinson DO; Koenigs MJ
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 4(6):227-30. PubMed ID: 511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Influence of hypertension and coronary heart disease on the hearing in the aged].
    Liu D
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1988; 23(6):342-5, 384-5. PubMed ID: 3153765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.
    Silman S; Silverman CA; Emmer MB; Gelfand SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice].
    von Wedel H
    HNO; 1986 Feb; 34(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3957726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest variability in testing hearing of speech.
    Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Johnson RL
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 511653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reactions to binaural hearing aid fitting.
    Markides A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():197-205. PubMed ID: 6955926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.