These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29959305)

  • 21. Cephalometric Floating Norms for the
    Perinetti G; Ceschi M; Scalia A; Contardo L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8740731. PubMed ID: 29850584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway in patients with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Zheng ZH; Yamaguchi T; Kurihara A; Li HF; Maki K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24033888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Functional needs in orthognathic patients with different sagittal skeletal discrepancies.
    Borzabadi-Farahani A; Olkun HK; Eslamian L; Eslamipour F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Aug; 138(2):255-260. PubMed ID: 38749877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determining the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible: a cephalometric analysis to clear up the confusion.
    Davis GS; Cannon JL; Messersmith ML
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(1):22-8; quiz 29-30. PubMed ID: 23909085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tau Angle: A New Approach for Assessment of True Sagittal Maxillomandibular Relationship.
    Gupta P; Singh N; Tripathi T; Gopal R; Rai P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 33623336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
    Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible.
    Nanda RS; Merrill RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Apr; 105(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 8154458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of cephalometric analyses for assessing sagittal jaw relationship.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Nov; 18(11):679-83. PubMed ID: 18983790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Feb; 87(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 3855607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A New Approach for the Assessment of True Maxillomandibular Sagittal Relationship: A Zeta Angle.
    Mohelay N; Dua N; Maqhbool SB; Shamsuddin S; Riyaz K; Sonawane V
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57788. PubMed ID: 38721219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between the cranial base and jaw base in a Chinese population.
    Chin A; Perry S; Liao C; Yang Y
    Head Face Med; 2014 Aug; 10():31. PubMed ID: 25129070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
    Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.