These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29959305)

  • 41. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study.
    Claudino LV; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant' Anna EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):799-809. PubMed ID: 23726330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Lee SH; Kaban LB; Lahey ET
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 25622883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Association between quality of life and severity of profile deviation in prospective orthognathic patients.
    Kämäräinen M; Alanko O; Svedström-Oristo AL; Peltomäki T
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 42(3):290-294. PubMed ID: 31880302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
    Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Predicting the sagittal skeletal pattern using dental cast and facial profile photographs in children aged 9 to 14 years.
    Sukhia RH; Nuruddin R; Azam SI; Fida M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Nov; 72(11):2198-2203. PubMed ID: 37013286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On the interaction between incisor crown-root morphology and third-order angulation.
    Knösel M; Jung K; Attin T; Engelke W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Gripp-Rudolph L; Attin R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 19413389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Establishment of norms of the beta angle to assess the sagittal discrepancy for Nellore district population.
    Prasad M; Reddy KP; Talapaneni AK; Chaitanya N; Bhaskar Reddy MV; Patil R
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 4(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 24082742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
    Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Postsurgical volumetric airway changes in 2-jaw orthognathic surgery patients.
    Hart PS; McIntyre BP; Kadioglu O; Currier GF; Sullivan SM; Li J; Shay C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):536-46. PubMed ID: 25919099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison of five different methods for describing sagittal jaw relationship.
    Kirchner J; Williams S
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 20(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8439526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.
    Tindlund RS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul; 31(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 7918525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. 3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements.
    Farronato M; Maspero C; Abate A; Grippaudo C; Connelly ST; Tartaglia GM
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6295-6302. PubMed ID: 32382843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients.
    Iwasaki H; Ishikawa H; Chowdhury L; Nakamura S; Iida J
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 12407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns.
    Sundareswaran S; Kumar V
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2015; 6(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 25810649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Skeletal variations in children with Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Rusić-Tasić V
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1990; 23(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 2206405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A nonradiographic approach to detect Class III skeletal discrepancies.
    Staudt CB; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19577148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.