These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29959452)

  • 1. Attention orienting near the hand following performed and imagined actions.
    Garza JP; Reed CL; Roberts RJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2603-2610. PubMed ID: 29959452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention.
    Garza JP; Strom MJ; Wright CE; Roberts RJ; Reed CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):819-23. PubMed ID: 23722884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing.
    Barthélémy S; Boulinguez P
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 133(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 12048178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.
    Glover S; Dixon P; Castiello U; Rushworth MF
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16082537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex-specific effects of posture on the attribution of handedness to an imagined agent.
    Marzoli D; Lucafò C; Rescigno C; Mussini E; Padulo C; Prete G; D'Anselmo A; Malatesta G; Tommasi L
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1163-1171. PubMed ID: 28175962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handedness and Graspability Modify Shifts of Visuospatial Attention to Near-Hand Objects.
    Colman HA; Remington RW; Kritikos A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170542. PubMed ID: 28125635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imagining others' handedness: visual and motor processes in the attribution of the dominant hand to an imagined agent.
    Marzoli D; Menditto S; Lucafò C; Tommasi L
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 229(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 23743716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imagery of errors in typing.
    Rieger M; Martinez F; Wenke D
    Cognition; 2011 Nov; 121(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 21821234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of response-delay on estimating reachability.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1502-14. PubMed ID: 18853329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in trunk orientation do not induce asymmetries in covert orienting.
    Westwood DA; Jones SA; Cowper-Smith CD; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1193-205. PubMed ID: 23666630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
    Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical microstimulation of primate posterior parietal cortex initiates orienting and alerting components of covert attention.
    Cutrell EB; Marrocco RT
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 11976764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution - Do imagined and executed movements code relative environmental features?
    Roberts JW; Welsh TN; Wakefield CJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 370():111951. PubMed ID: 31108114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining.
    Guzzon D; Brignani D; Miniussi C; Marzi CA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 20421095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.
    Chica AB; Sanabria D; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 17160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye gaze triggers reflexive attention shifts: evidence from lateralised ERPs.
    Feng Q; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 1589():37-44. PubMed ID: 25241361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric differences in attentional orienting by social cues.
    Greene DJ; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21093465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.