212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29960450)
1. Acoustic features of auditory medical alarms-An experimental study of alarm volume.
Schlesinger JJ; Baum Miller SH; Nash K; Bruce M; Ashmead D; Shotwell MS; Edworthy JR; Wallace MT; Weinger MB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3688. PubMed ID: 29960450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Influence of Audible Alarm Loudness and Type on Clinical Multitasking.
Bruder AL; Rothwell CD; Fuhr LI; Shotwell MS; Edworthy JR; Schlesinger JJ
J Med Syst; 2021 Nov; 46(1):5. PubMed ID: 34812925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulating environmental and psychological acoustic factors of the operating room.
Bennett CL; Dudaryk R; Ayers AL; McNeer RR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3855-63. PubMed ID: 26723340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
Chen F; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soundscape evaluations in two critical healthcare settings with different designs.
Okcu S; Ryherd EE; Zimring C; Samuels O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1348-58. PubMed ID: 21895076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech based transmission index for all: An intelligibility metric for variable hearing ability.
Mechergui N; Djaziri-Larbi S; Jaïdane M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1470. PubMed ID: 28372108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
