197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29960471)
1. When singing with cochlear implants, are two ears worse than one for perilingually/postlingually deaf individuals?
Aronoff JM; Kirchner A; Abbs E; Harmon B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL503. PubMed ID: 29960471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Music appreciation and music listening in prelingual and postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
Moran M; Rousset A; Looi V
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S57-63. PubMed ID: 27045837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
Luo X; Garrett C
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.
Steel MM; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117611. PubMed ID: 25668423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear Implant Users' Vocal Control CorrelatesAcross Tasks.
Abbs E; Aronoff JM; Kirchner A; O'Brien E; Harmon B
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):490.e7-490.e10. PubMed ID: 30447798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
Zhou X; Li H; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan W
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cortical reorganization in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users: Intra-modal and cross-modal considerations.
Stropahl M; Chen LC; Debener S
Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():128-137. PubMed ID: 27473503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users.
Freeman V; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1043. PubMed ID: 28863583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults.
Leigh JR; Moran M; Hollow R; Dowell RC
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S3-8. PubMed ID: 26963131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional Scaling.
Stupak N; Padilla M; Morse RP; Landsberger DM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807535. PubMed ID: 30378468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Mao Y; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 27564095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment.
Looi V; Bluett C; Boisvert I
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):919-925. PubMed ID: 28678547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pitch matching in bimodal cochlear implant patients: Effects of frequency, spectral envelope, and level.
Maarefvand M; Blamey PJ; Marozeau J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):2854. PubMed ID: 29195427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Categorisation of natural sounds at different stages of auditory recovery in cochlear implant adult deaf patients.
Strelnikov K; Collett E; Gaillard P; Truy E; Déguine O; Marx M; Barone P
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():182-194. PubMed ID: 29914727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
