These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29960505)

  • 1. Perceptual evaluation of measures of spectral variance.
    Agus N; Anderson H; Chen JM; Lui S; Herremans D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3300. PubMed ID: 29960505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Perceptual Distinguishability Predictor For JND-noise-contaminated Images.
    Hadizadeh H; Heravi AR; Bajic IV; Karami P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 30507532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral distortion level resulting in a just-noticeable difference between an a priori signal-to-noise ratio estimate and its instantaneous case.
    Nicolson A; Paliwal KK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):1879. PubMed ID: 33138496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning-Based Just-Noticeable-Quantization- Distortion Modeling for Perceptual Video Coding.
    Ki S; Bae SH; Kim M; Ko H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; 27(7):3178-3193. PubMed ID: 29641399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep Learning based Picture-Wise Just Noticeable Distortion Prediction Model for Image Compression.
    Liu H; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Fan C; Kwong S; Kuo CJ; Fan X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 31425033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual and Model-Based Evaluation of Ideal Time-Frequency Noise Reduction in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Koning R; Bruce IC; Denys S; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Mar; 26(3):687-697. PubMed ID: 29522412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultra-low-dose CT image denoising using modified BM3D scheme tailored to data statistics.
    Zhao T; Hoffman J; McNitt-Gray M; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 30351450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward Top-Down Just Noticeable Difference Estimation of Natural Images.
    Jiang Q; Liu Z; Wang S; Shao F; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3697-3712. PubMed ID: 35594233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring timbre discrimination with cross-faded synthetic tones.
    Rahne T; Rasinski C; Neumann K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jun; 189(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 20350567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity discrimination of Gaussian-windowed tones: indications for the shape of the auditory frequency-time window.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3425-35. PubMed ID: 10380666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Just Noticeable Difference Estimation for Screen Content Images.
    Wang S; Ma L; Fang Y; Lin W; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Aug; 25(8):3838-51. PubMed ID: 27249834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. White noise analysis of pace-maker-response interactions and non-linearities in slowly adapting crayfish stretch receptor.
    Buño W; Bustamante J; Fuentes J
    J Physiol; 1984 May; 350():55-80. PubMed ID: 6747858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated estimation of white Gaussian noise level in a spectrum with or without spike noise using a spectral shifting technique.
    Schulze HG; Yu MM; Addison CJ; Blades MW; Turner RF
    Appl Spectrosc; 2006 Jul; 60(7):820-5. PubMed ID: 16854272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.