BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29960708)

  • 1. Multicenter evaluation of the Access AMH antimüllerian hormone assay for the prediction of antral follicle count and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Baker VL; Gracia C; Glassner MJ; Schnell VL; Doody K; Coddington CC; Shin SS; Marshall LA; Alper MM; Morales AJ; Pavone ME; Behera MA; Zbella EA; Shapiro BS; Straseski JA; Broyles DL
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Aug; 110(3):506-513.e3. PubMed ID: 29960708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation study of the Access antimüllerian hormone assay for the prediction of poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Baker VL; Glassner MJ; Doody K; Schnell VL; Gracia C; Shin SS; Behera MA; Le Saint CM; Alper MM; Pavone ME; Zbella EA; Coddington CC; Marshall LA; Feinberg RF; Cooper AR; Straseski JA; Broyles DL
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Aug; 116(2):575-582. PubMed ID: 33812650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
    Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation-A Real-World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients.
    Wang X; Jin L; Mao YD; Shi JZ; Huang R; Jiang YN; Zhang CL; Liang XY
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():702061. PubMed ID: 34526967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials.
    Nelson SM; Klein BM; Arce JC
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):923-930.e1. PubMed ID: 25624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment?
    Lee Y; Kim TH; Park JK; Eum JH; Lee HJ; Kim J; Lyu SW; Kim YS; Lee WS; Yoon TK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():151-155. PubMed ID: 29306180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antimüllerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients.
    Arce JC; La Marca A; Mirner Klein B; Nyboe Andersen A; Fleming R
    Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1644-53. PubMed ID: 23394782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET.
    Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Jayaprakasan K; Campbell B; Hopkisson J; Johnson I; Raine-Fenning N
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 19046583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective study into the value of the automated Elecsys antimüllerian hormone assay for the assessment of the ovarian growing follicle pool.
    Anderson RA; Anckaert E; Bosch E; Dewailly D; Dunlop CE; Fehr D; Nardo L; Smitz J; Tremellen K; Denk B; Geistanger A; Hund M
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):1074-1080.e4. PubMed ID: 25681853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Mutlu MF; Erdem M; Erdem A; Yildiz S; Mutlu I; Arisoy O; Oktem M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2013 Jun; 30(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 23508679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarian response in stimulated (IVF and ICSI) cycles.
    Tolikas A; Tsakos E; Gerou S; Prapas Y; Loufopoulos A
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Dec; 14(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22088130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anti-Müllerian hormone: correlation of early follicular, ovulatory and midluteal levels with ovarian response and cycle outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients.
    Elgindy EA; El-Haieg DO; El-Sebaey A
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1670-6. PubMed ID: 17658520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as prognostic indicators in a personalized prediction model of live birth.
    Nelson SM; Fleming R; Gaudoin M; Choi B; Santo-Domingo K; Yao M
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Aug; 104(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 26003269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of serum AMH and antral follicle count discrepancy for the prediction of ovarian stimulation response in Poseidon criteria patients.
    Hochberg A; Dahan MH; Yarali H; Vuong LN; Esteves SC
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Mar; 41(3):717-726. PubMed ID: 38358433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos.
    Majumder K; Gelbaya TA; Laing I; Nardo LG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 20223579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ovarian response is associated with anogenital distance in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.
    Fabregues F; González-Foruria I; Peñarrubia J; Carmona F
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1696-1704. PubMed ID: 30016431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can highly sensitive antimüllerian hormone testing predict failed response to ovarian stimulation?
    Burks HR; Ross L; Opper N; Paulson E; Stanczyk FZ; Chung K
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 26158904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New automated antimüllerian hormone assays are more reliable than the manual assay in patients with reduced antral follicle count.
    Tadros T; Tarasconi B; Nassar J; Benhaim JL; Taieb J; Fanchin R
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1800-1806. PubMed ID: 27692436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of ovarian response in women treated with corifollitropin alfa for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Polyzos NP; Tournaye H; Guzman L; Camus M; Nelson SM
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 23668992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.