BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

838 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29961041)

  • 1. Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh.
    Uddin MN; Islam FMA; Al Mahmud A
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e022967. PubMed ID: 29961041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric evaluation of the modified Kessler seven-item version (K7) for measuring psychological distress using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study in a rural district of Bangladesh.
    Uddin MN; Islam FMA
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e034523. PubMed ID: 32086357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for use in a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh: an application of Rasch analysis.
    Uddin MN; Islam FMA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 19(1):216. PubMed ID: 30953506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric evaluation of the modified 19-item Bengali version of WHOQOL scale using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh.
    Uddin MN; Amirul Islam FM
    BMC Psychol; 2020 May; 8(1):44. PubMed ID: 32357921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychological distress and quality of life: rationale and protocol of a prospective cohort study in a rural district in Bangaladesh.
    Uddin MN; Bhar S; Al Mahmud A; Islam FMA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016745. PubMed ID: 28864700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.
    Simpelaere IS; Van Nuffelen G; De Bodt M; Vanderwegen J; Hansen T
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):66. PubMed ID: 28388899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological distress and its association with socio-demographic factors in a rural district in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.
    Islam FMA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212765. PubMed ID: 30865656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Kessler psychological distress scale: translation and validation of an Arabic version.
    Easton SD; Safadi NS; Wang Y; Hasson RG
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Oct; 15(1):215. PubMed ID: 29078774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults.
    Pereira A; Oliveira CA; Bártolo A; Monteiro S; Vagos P; Jardim J
    Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Mar; 24(3):729-736. PubMed ID: 30892495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation and validation of short scales for assessment of psychological distress in Iran: The Persian K10 and K6.
    Hajebi A; Motevalian A; Amin-Esmaeili M; Rahimi-Movaghar A; Sharifi V; Hoseini L; Shadloo B; Mojtabai R
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2018 Sep; 27(3):e1726. PubMed ID: 29888523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement invariance of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among children of Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers.
    Ren Q; Li Y; Chen DG
    Brain Behav; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e2417. PubMed ID: 34775684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in the 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey.
    Bougie E; Arim RG; Kohen DE; Findlay LC
    Health Rep; 2016 Jan; 27(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 26788720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement properties of the Swedish clinical outcomes in routine evaluation outcome measures (CORE-OM): Rasch analysis and short version for depressed and anxious out-patients in a multicultural area.
    Danielsson L; Elfström ML; Galan Henche J; Melin J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Feb; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 35183201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring psychological distress using the K10 in Kenya.
    Ongeri L; Ametaj A; Kim H; Stroud RE; Newton CR; Kariuki SM; Atwoli L; Kwobah E; Gelaye B
    J Affect Disord; 2022 Apr; 303():155-160. PubMed ID: 35151672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the structure of Brazilian State-Trait Anxiety Inventory using a Rasch psychometric approach.
    Kaipper MB; Chachamovich E; Hidalgo MP; Torres IL; Caumo W
    J Psychosom Res; 2010 Mar; 68(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 20159207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel.
    Sampasa-Kanyinga H; Zamorski MA; Colman I
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196562. PubMed ID: 29698459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring distress in older population: Rasch analysis of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.
    Calkin CJ; Numbers K; Brodaty H; Sachdev PS; Medvedev ON
    J Affect Disord; 2023 Jun; 330():117-124. PubMed ID: 36863471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Kessler-10 among Ethiopian adults.
    Milkias B; Ametaj A; Alemayehu M; Girma E; Yared M; Kim HH; Stroud R; Stevenson A; Gelaye B; Teferra S
    J Affect Disord; 2022 Apr; 303():180-186. PubMed ID: 35151678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire.
    Vincent JI; MacDermid JC; King GJ; Grewal R
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Jun; 13():84. PubMed ID: 26092294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.