These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29961089)

  • 1. Reaction to Koppen et al., 'Assessing colonic anatomy normal values based on air contrast enemas in children younger than 6 years'.
    Levin MD
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Oct; 48(11):1674-1677. PubMed ID: 29961089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concerning our publication 'Assessing colonic anatomy normal values based on air contrast enemas in children younger than 6 years': reply to M. D. Levin.
    Koppen IJN; Yacob D; Di Lorenzo C; Saps M; Benninga MA; Cooper JN; Minneci PC; Deans KJ; Gregory Bates D; Thompson BP
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Oct; 48(11):1678-1680. PubMed ID: 29961090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing colonic anatomy normal values based on air contrast enemas in children younger than 6 years.
    Koppen IJ; Yacob D; Di Lorenzo C; Saps M; Benninga MA; Cooper JN; Minneci PC; Deans KJ; Bates DG; Thompson BP
    Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Mar; 47(3):306-312. PubMed ID: 27896373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. John Caffey Award. Colonic perforation by air and liquid enemas: comparison study in young pigs.
    Shiels WE; Kirks DR; Keller GL; Ryckman FR; Daugherty CC; Specker BL; Summa DW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 8470606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nodular colonic mucosa of childhood: normal or pathologic?
    Riddlesberger MM; Lebenthal E
    Gastroenterology; 1980 Aug; 79(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 7399229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antegrade enemas for defecation disorders: do they improve the colonic motility?
    Aspirot A; Fernandez S; Di Lorenzo C; Skaggs B; Mousa H
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Aug; 44(8):1575-80. PubMed ID: 19635308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colonic manometry as predictor of cecostomy success in children with defecation disorders.
    van den Berg MM; Hogan M; Caniano DA; Di Lorenzo C; Benninga MA; Mousa HM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Apr; 41(4):730-6; discussion 730-6. PubMed ID: 16567185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colon enemas for fecal incontinence in patients with spina bifida.
    Vande Velde S; Van Biervliet S; Van Laecke E; De Bruyne R; Verhelst H; Hoebeke P; Van Winckel M
    J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):300-4. PubMed ID: 23174228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracolonic pressure measurements during hydrostatic and air contrast barium enema studies in children.
    Zambuto D; Bramson RT; Blickman JG
    Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 7784589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colonic cleansing for radiographic detection of neoplasia: efficacy of the magnesium citrate-castor oil-cleansing enema regimen.
    Gelfand DW; Chen YM; Ott DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):705-8. PubMed ID: 3262270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of intracolonic lesion by barium contrast enema. The importance of adequate colon preparation to diagnostic accuracy.
    Knutson CO; Williams HC; Max MH
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(20):2206-8. PubMed ID: 490808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcome and efficacy of antegrade colonic enemas administered via an indwelling cecostomy catheter in adults with defecatory disorders.
    Patton V; Lubowski DZ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Apr; 58(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 25751803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of screening sonography on the positive rate of enemas for intussusception.
    Henrikson S; Blane CE; Koujok K; Strouse PJ; DiPietro MA; Goodsitt MM
    Pediatr Radiol; 2003 Mar; 33(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 12612819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests.
    Bosworth HB; Rockey DC; Paulson EK; Niedzwiecki D; Davis W; Sanders LL; Yee J; Henderson J; Hatten P; Burdick S; Sanyal A; Rubin DT; Sterling M; Akerkar G; Bhutani MS; Binmoeller K; Garvie J; Bini EJ; McQuaid K; Foster WL; Thompson WM; Dachman A; Halvorsen R
    Am J Med; 2006 Sep; 119(9):791-9. PubMed ID: 16945615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colonic cleansing, fluid absorption, and discomfort following tap water and soapsuds enemas.
    Schmelzer M; Case P; Chappell SM; Wright KB
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 May; 13(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 10842904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing single- and double-contrast colon examinations.
    Gelfand DW; Ott DJ; Chen YM
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1987; 27(2):167-201. PubMed ID: 3301216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large bowel diseases in New Zealand based on 1118 air contrast enemas.
    Sim GP; Scobie BA
    N Z Med J; 1982 Sep; 95(715):611-3. PubMed ID: 6957779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do antegrade enemas work? Colonic motility in response to administration of normal saline solution into the proximal colon.
    Gomez R; Mousa H; Liem O; Hayes J; Di Lorenzo C
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2010 Dec; 51(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 20890219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antegrade colonic enemas and intestinal diversion are highly effective in the management of children with intractable constipation.
    Christison-Lagay ER; Rodriguez L; Kurtz M; St Pierre K; Doody DP; Goldstein AM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Jan; 45(1):213-9; discussion 219. PubMed ID: 20105606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intussusception in children: current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction.
    del-Pozo G; Albillos JC; Tejedor D; Calero R; Rasero M; de-la-Calle U; López-Pacheco U
    Radiographics; 1999; 19(2):299-319. PubMed ID: 10194781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.