These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29961411)
1. From Outcome to Process Focus: Fostering a More Robust Psychological Science Through Registered Reports and Results-Blind Reviewing. Grand JA; Rogelberg SG; Banks GC; Landis RS; Tonidandel S Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):448-456. PubMed ID: 29961411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scholarly Merit in a Global Context: The Nation Gap in Psychological Science. Cheek NN Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1133-1137. PubMed ID: 29149576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Website System for Communicating Psychological Science. Diener E Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Jul; 12(4):684-689. PubMed ID: 28727962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting. Dougherty MR; Slevc LR; Grand JA Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 14(3):361-375. PubMed ID: 30629888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication. Foxe JJ; Bolam P Eur J Neurosci; 2017 May; 45(9):1125-1126. PubMed ID: 28186675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research. Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5475. PubMed ID: 31527134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How to review a scientific paper. Tandon R Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():124-7. PubMed ID: 25248566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. Faggion CM Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers. Simons DJ; Shoda Y; Lindsay DS Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1123-1128. PubMed ID: 28853993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "On the ruins of seriality": The scientific journal and the nature of the scientific life. Daling D Endeavour; 2023 Dec; 47(4):100885. PubMed ID: 37984049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions. Barroga EF J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop. Kulage KM; Larson EL J Prof Nurs; 2016; 32(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 27424926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reimagining peer review: the emergence of peer community in registered reports system. Zoccali C; Mallamaci F J Nephrol; 2023 Dec; 36(9):2407-2411. PubMed ID: 37594669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]