These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29961625)

  • 1. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures.
    Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New mini dental implant attachments versus O-ring attachment after cyclic aging: Analysis of retention strength and gap space.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Cao YG
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 37(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 28585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro assessment of polyetheretherketone for an attachment component for an implant-retained overdenture.
    da Silva GG; Shimano MVW; Macedo AP; da Costa Valente ML; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):319.e1-319.e8. PubMed ID: 34857392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Elhaddad AA; Khirallah AS
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 27589487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The
    Kurtulus IL; Gurbulak AG
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):639-644. PubMed ID: 29735866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
    Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of Different Attachment Systems for Digitally Designed Mandibular Implant Overdenture.
    Abdelaziz MS; Fawzy AM; Ghali RM; Nassar HI
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 35344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
    Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.