These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29962289)

  • 1. Effects of precompression time and strength on the physical characteristics of quasi-stapled porcine small intestinal tissue.
    Zhou Y; Lin Q; Xu J; Wei S; Yang C; Wang B; Song C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Aug; 232(8):741-752. PubMed ID: 29962289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in Small Intestine Tissue Compressed by a Linear Stapler Based on Cole
    Zhou Y; Ren B; Li B; Xu J; Jin Y; Song C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Dec; 44(12):3583-3592. PubMed ID: 27411708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serosal Laceration During Firing of Powered Linear Stapler Is a Predictor of Staple Malformation.
    Matsuzawa F; Homma S; Yoshida T; Konishi Y; Shibasaki S; Ishikawa T; Kawamura H; Takahashi N; Iijima H; Taketomi A
    Surg Innov; 2017 Dec; 24(6):590-597. PubMed ID: 28962536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of precompression time for secure stapling with a linear stapler.
    Nakayama S; Hasegawa S; Nagayama S; Kato S; Hida K; Tanaka E; Itami A; Kubo H; Sakai Y
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2382-6. PubMed ID: 21184102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profiling Surgical Staplers: Does Staple Direction Affect the Strength of the Anastomosis.
    Kimura M; Takahashi H; Tanaka T; Sagawa H; Takeyama H
    Dig Surg; 2015; 32(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 26488286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the time interval between clamping and linear stapling for resection of porcine small intestine.
    Morita K; Maeda N; Kawaoka T; Hiraki S; Kudo A; Fukuda S; Oka M
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Mar; 22(3):750-6. PubMed ID: 17694412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and performance evaluation of a powered stapler for gastrointestinal anastomosis.
    Wang H; Ge W; Liu C; Wang P; Song C
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Apr; 31(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 33412971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Profiling Surgical Staplers: How to Increase the Strength of Anastomoses between the Edematous and Normal Intestine.
    Kimura M; Terashita Y
    Am Surg; 2016 Dec; 82(12):e333-335. PubMed ID: 28234160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface deformation analysis of end-to-end stapled intestinal anastomosis.
    Yang J; Soltz M; Russell H; Beres J; Zhao J; Liao D; Gregersen H
    Surg Innov; 2012 Sep; 19(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 22075437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure.
    Myers SR; Rothermel WS; Shaffer L
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):3043-9. PubMed ID: 21487874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Tri-Staple Technology and Slow Firing on Secure Stapling Using an Endoscopic Linear Stapler.
    Hasegawa S; Nakayama S; Hida K; Kawada K; Sakai Y
    Dig Surg; 2015; 32(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 26228297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation.
    Kimura M; Kuwabara Y; Taniwaki S; Mitsui A; Shibata Y; Ueno S
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29108894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obtaining secure stapling of a double stapling anastomosis.
    Nakayama S; Hasegawa S; Hida K; Kawada K; Sakai Y
    J Surg Res; 2015 Feb; 193(2):652-7. PubMed ID: 25277356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not?
    Giaccaglia V; Antonelli MS; Addario Chieco P; Cocorullo G; Cavallini M; Gulotta G
    J Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 197(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 25918006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased burst pressure in gastrointestinal staple-lines using reinforcement with a bioprosthetic material.
    Downey DM; Harre JG; Dolan JP
    Obes Surg; 2005; 15(10):1379-83. PubMed ID: 16354515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sutureless small bowel anastomoses: experimental study in pigs.
    Zilling TL; Jansson O; Walther BS; Ottosson A
    Eur J Surg; 1999 Jan; 165(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 10069636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of staple size, tissue thickness, and precompression time on staple shape in side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in specimens obtained from healthy horses at an abattoir.
    Giusto G; Gandini M; Amedeo S
    Am J Vet Res; 2014 Jul; 75(7):680-4. PubMed ID: 24959735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design.
    Contini E; Godek ML; Whiffen JM; Bronson DG
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keyhole procedure: a new technique for intestinal anastomosis with a large opening and less tissue trauma, using both circular and linear staplers.
    Takeyama H; Sato M; Akamo Y; Tanaka M; Hayakawa T; Hasegawa M; Sawai H; Yamamoto M; Ohara E; Manabe T
    Surgery; 2003 Mar; 133(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 12660653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element modelling of stapled colorectal end-to-end anastomosis: advantages of variable height stapler design.
    Nováček V; Tran TN; Klinge U; Tolba RH; Staat M; Bronson DG; Miesse AM; Whiffen J; Turquier F
    J Biomech; 2012 Oct; 45(15):2693-7. PubMed ID: 22871347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.