These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29962413)

  • 1. Static and dynamic evaluations of the wettability of commercial vinyl polysiloxane impression materials for artificial saliva.
    Luo F; Hong G; Wang T; Jia L; Chen JY; Suo L; Pei XB; Wan QB
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):818-824. PubMed ID: 29962413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Sadan A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):310. PubMed ID: 16121746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Jacobi A; Groten M; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 15681007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of radiofrequency glow discharge on impression material surface wettability.
    Hesby RM; Haganman CR; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):414-22. PubMed ID: 9104719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    DeLong R; Pintado MR; Ko CC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 11512112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coating of silicone-based impression materials in a glow-discharge system by acrylic acid plasma.
    Ozden N; Ayhan H; Erkut S; Can G; Pişkin E
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 9758971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicable research in practice: understanding the hydrophilic and flow property measurements of impression materials.
    Perry RD; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Orfanidis J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Oct; 27(10):582-6. PubMed ID: 17120392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials.
    Mondon M; Ziegler C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wettability of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai JY; Yeung TC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 1817528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of chlorine-based disinfectant on wettability of a vinyl polysiloxane impression material.
    Blalock JS; Cooper JR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 20970540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.