These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29962413)

  • 21. Effects of chlorine-based and quaternary ammonium-based disinfectants on the wettability of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Kang YS; Rueggeberg F; Ramos V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):266-270. PubMed ID: 27765401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Alginate substitutes: rationale for their.
    Boksman L; Tousignant G
    Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):104-5. PubMed ID: 19408590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of time-dependent two-dimensional and three-dimensional stability with micro-computerized tomography and wettability of three impression materials.
    Karaaslan G; Malkoc MA; Yildirim G; Malkoc S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jul; 21(7):912-920. PubMed ID: 29984725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of a shear load on the viscosities of 10 vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Pang IC; Chai J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 7932265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An investigation of the rheological properties of 10 vinyl-polysiloxane impression materials.
    Chai J; Pang IC; Leong D; Kim JE; Torres P
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Sep; 2(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 8298720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 1813343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accurate impression material and technique for well-adapted restorations.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2007 Feb; 26(2):120, 122-3. PubMed ID: 17348280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wettability, imbibition, and mass change of disinfected low-viscosity impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC; Stroh GS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 12426496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contact angle of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Menees TS; Radhakrishnan R; Ramp LC; Burgess JO; Lawson NC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 26187106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of cross-linking agent and surfactant on the tear strength of novel vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e334-e343. PubMed ID: 30318115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials incorporating a novel surfactant compared with commercial VPS.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Tomlins P; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Aug; 33(8):e301-e309. PubMed ID: 28535951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative evaluation of three types of denture base materials with saliva substitute before and after thermocycling: An in vitro study.
    Jadhav V; Deshpande S; Radke U; Mahale H; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):590-594. PubMed ID: 33012529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surfactant release from hydrophilized vinylpolysiloxanes.
    Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Lochnit G; Wöstmann B
    J Dent Res; 2009 Jul; 88(7):668-72. PubMed ID: 19641156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rheological properties of vinyl polysiloxane impression pastes.
    Martinez JE; Combe EC; Pesun IJ
    Dent Mater; 2001 Nov; 17(6):471-6. PubMed ID: 11567683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A modified shark-fin test simulating the single-step/double-mix technique: A comparison of three groups of elastomers.
    Huettig F; Chekhani U; Klink A; Said F; Rupp F
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jun; 37(3):414-421. PubMed ID: 29491198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.