These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29962658)

  • 1. An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status.
    Prince Nelson SL; Ramakrishnan V; Nietert PJ; Kamen DL; Ramos PS; Wolf BJ
    Commun Stat Theory Methods; 2017; 46(21):10823-10834. PubMed ID: 29962658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome.
    Nelson SP; Ramakrishnan V; Nietert P; Kamen D; Ramos P; Wolf B
    Int J Biostat; 2022 Nov; 18(2):613-625. PubMed ID: 35536987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit: A feasible approach for optimal-threshold determination in shared decision making.
    Lin S; Ma Y; Zou H
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 26(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 31738475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation.
    Hajian-Tilaki K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2374-2383. PubMed ID: 28673124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximally selected chi-square statistics for ordinal variables.
    Boulesteix AL
    Biom J; 2006 Jun; 48(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 16845908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison between early outbreak detection models and simulated outbreaks of measles in Beijing].
    Wang XL; Wang QY; Liu DL; Zeng DJ; Cheng H; Li S; Duan W; Li XY; Luan RS; He X
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 30(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 19565878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note on dichotomization of continuous response variable in the presence of contamination and model misspecification.
    Shentu Y; Xie M
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(21):2200-14. PubMed ID: 20812301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximally selected chi-square statistics and binary splits of nominal variables.
    Boulesteix AL
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):838-48. PubMed ID: 17094347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the cutoff based on a continuous variable to define two populations with application to vaccines.
    Li S; Parnes M; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):662-80. PubMed ID: 23611202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dichotomization of continuous variables in logistic regression models].
    Cumsille F; Bangdiwala SI
    Rev Med Chil; 1996 Jul; 124(7):836-42. PubMed ID: 9138372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating Feature-Label Dependence Using Gini Distance Statistics.
    Zhang S; Dang X; Nguyen D; Wilkins D; Chen Y
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2021 Jun; 43(6):1947-1963. PubMed ID: 31869782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A note on the kappa statistic for clustered dichotomous data.
    Zhou M; Yang Z
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(14):2425-48. PubMed ID: 24488927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
    MacCallum RC; Zhang S; Preacher KJ; Rucker DD
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Mar; 7(1):19-40. PubMed ID: 11928888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel metric that quantifies risk stratification for evaluating diagnostic tests: The example of evaluating cervical-cancer screening tests across populations.
    Katki HA; Schiffman M
    Prev Med; 2018 May; 110():100-105. PubMed ID: 29454079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the effects of continuous and discrete covariate mismeasurement, with emphasis on the dichotomization of mismeasured predictors.
    Gustafson P; Le Nhu D
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):878-87. PubMed ID: 12495142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.
    Holmes AP; Blair RC; Watson JD; Ford I
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1996 Jan; 16(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 8530558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study.
    Jenniskens K; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():1-10. PubMed ID: 30904568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Youden's index and the weight of evidence.
    Hughes G
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 25658987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. At Odds: Concerns Raised by Using Odds Ratios for Continuous or Common Dichotomous Outcomes in Research on Physical Activity and Obesity.
    Lovasi GS; Underhill LJ; Jack D; Richards C; Weiss C; Rundle A
    Open Epidemiol J; 2012; 5():13-17. PubMed ID: 23002407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.