These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29962780)

  • 1. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Newer Nanoposterior Restorative Resin Composites: An
    Meenakumari C; Bhat KM; Bansal R; Singh N
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Jun; 9(Suppl 1):S142-S146. PubMed ID: 29962780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Hardness of Newer Nanoposterior Composite Resins after Immersion in Food-Simulating Liquids.
    Kumari CM; Bhat KM; Bansal R; Singh N; Anupama A; Lavanya T
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(2):289-293. PubMed ID: 32308292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
    Leprince JG; Palin WM; Vanacker J; Sabbagh J; Devaux J; Leloup G
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative.
    Alrahlah A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29358529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of surface roughness of different restorative composites after polishing using atomic force microscopy.
    Kumari CM; Bhat KM; Bansal R
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 26957795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Filler Particle Sizes on the Physical Properties of Bulk-Fill Composites Compared to Conventional Composites.
    Nagrale A; Nevrekar S; Kawle S; Gawande H; Gupte J; Gaikwad S
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36032. PubMed ID: 37056541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexural strength and microhardness of anterior composites after accelerated aging.
    Pala K; Tekçe N; Tuncer S; Demirci M; Öznurhan F; Serim M
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Mar; 9(3):e424-e430. PubMed ID: 28298986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of Inorganic Filler Content, Mechanical Properties, and Light Transmission of Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
    Fronza BM; Ayres A; Pacheco RR; Rueggeberg FA; Dias C; Giannini M
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):445-455. PubMed ID: 28402731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
    Jung JH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Flexural Properties of Bulk-fill Restorative/Flowable Composites and Their Conventional Counterparts.
    Eweis AH; Yap AU; Yahya NA
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 31034352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of curing intensity on mechanical properties of different bulk-fill composite resins.
    Alkhudhairy FI
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2017; 9():1-6. PubMed ID: 28260947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of physical properties of three commercial composite core build-up materials.
    Warangkulkasemkit S; Pumpaluk P
    Dent Mater J; 2019 Mar; 38(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 30381634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and the flexural strength.
    Gömeç Y; Dörter C; Dabanoglu A; Koray F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Feb; 32(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 15641978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations.
    Thomaidis S; Kakaboura A; Mueller WD; Zinelis S
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e132-41. PubMed ID: 23790281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.
    Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microhardness and water solubility of expired and non-expired shelf-life composites.
    Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic E; Donmez N; Kazak M; Duc B; Aslantas A
    Int J Artif Organs; 2019 Jan; 42(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 30058467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of wear resistance and flexural strength of three kinds of bulk-fill composite resins].
    Zhang H; Zhang ML; Qiu LH; Yu JT; Zhan FL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Jun; 25(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 27609380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of mechanical properties on three nanofilled composites.
    Rosa RS; Balbinot CE; Blando E; Mota EG; Oshima HM; Hirakata L; Pires LA; Hübler R
    Stomatologija; 2012; 14(4):126-30. PubMed ID: 23455982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials.
    Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Chen HY; Hickel R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 10898876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.