These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29962827)

  • 1. Informed Consent in Translational Genomics: Insufficient Without Trustworthy Governance.
    Burke W; Beskow LM; Trinidad SB; Fullerton SM; Brelsford K
    J Law Med Ethics; 2018 Mar; 46(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 29962827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The challenge of informed consent and return of results in translational genomics: empirical analysis and recommendations.
    Henderson GE; Wolf SM; Kuczynski KJ; Joffe S; Sharp RR; Parsons DW; Knoppers BM; Yu JH; Appelbaum PS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2014; 42(3):344-55. PubMed ID: 25264092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A framework for tiered informed consent for health genomic research in Africa.
    Nembaware V; Johnston K; Diallo AA; Kotze MJ; Matimba A; Moodley K; Tangwa GB; Torrorey-Sawe R; Tiffin N
    Nat Genet; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1566-1571. PubMed ID: 31659323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents.
    Munung NS; Marshall P; Campbell M; Littler K; Masiye F; Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer O; Seeley J; Stein DJ; Tindana P; de Vries J
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 26644426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.
    Robinson JO; Slashinski MJ; Wang T; Hilsenbeck SG; McGuire AL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Oct; 8(4):42-52. PubMed ID: 24169421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical endgames: broad consent for narrow interests; open consent for closed minds.
    Karlsen JR; Solbakk JH; Holm S
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Oct; 20(4):572-83. PubMed ID: 21843388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In defense of broad consent.
    Helgesson G
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2012 Jan; 21(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 22152457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.
    Wolf SM; Scholtes E; Koenig BA; Petersen GM; Berry SA; Beskow LM; Daly MB; Fernandez CV; Green RC; LeRoy BS; Lindor NM; O'Rourke PP; Breitkopf CR; Rothstein MA; Van Ness B; Wilfond BS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2018 Mar; 46(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 30008546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent.
    Knoppers BM
    EMBO Rep; 2010 Jun; 11(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 20448662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
    Trinidad SB; Fullerton SM; Ludman EJ; Jarvik GP; Larson EB; Burke W
    Science; 2011 Jan; 331(6015):287-8. PubMed ID: 21252333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meeting the growing demands of genetic research.
    McGuire AL; Gibbs RA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(4):809-12. PubMed ID: 17199822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
    Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motivating donors to genetic research? Anthropological reasons to rethink the role of informed consent.
    Hoeyer K; Lynöe N
    Med Health Care Philos; 2006; 9(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16645794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethics. Identifiability in genomic research.
    Lowrance WW; Collins FS
    Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5838):600-2. PubMed ID: 17673640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Knowing who to trust: exploring the role of 'ethical metadata' in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa.
    de Vries J; Williams TN; Bojang K; Kwiatkowski DP; Fitzpatrick R; Parker M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Aug; 15():62. PubMed ID: 25124199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research.
    Kaye J
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2012; 13():415-31. PubMed ID: 22404490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic research data: open vs. restricted access.
    Resnik DB
    IRB; 2010; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 20184218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The complexities of ethical evaluation of genomics research.
    Hoedemaekers R; Gordijn B; Hekster Y; van Agt F
    HEC Forum; 2006 Mar; 18(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 17076127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. H3Africa: An Africa exemplar? Exploring its framework on protecting human research participants.
    Nnamuchi O
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Jun; 18(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 28470782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. We need to think about data governance for dementia research in a digital era.
    Milne R; Brayne C
    Alzheimers Res Ther; 2020 Jan; 12(1):17. PubMed ID: 32005135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.