These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29962994)

  • 41. Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors.
    Park YS; Xing K; Lee YS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):376-392. PubMed ID: 30034055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The DINA model as a constrained general diagnostic model: Two variants of a model equivalency.
    von Davier M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 23297749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.
    Yigit HD; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):388-401. PubMed ID: 31235984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis [Formula: see text] Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):333-357. PubMed ID: 30456748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment.
    McGlohen M; Chang HH
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Aug; 40(3):808-21. PubMed ID: 18697677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bayesian Modal Estimation of the Four-Parameter Item Response Model in Real, Realistic, and Idealized Data Sets.
    Waller NG; Feuerstahler L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 28306347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. New Item Selection Method Accommodating Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing: Maximum Deviation and Maximum Limitation Global Discrimination Indexes.
    Li J; Ma L; Zeng P; Kang C
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():619771. PubMed ID: 34079491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cognitive Diagnostic Models With Attribute Hierarchies: Model Estimation With a Restricted Q-Matrix Design.
    Tu D; Wang S; Cai Y; Douglas J; Chang HH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):255-271. PubMed ID: 31156279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Deterministic Input, Noisy Mixed Modeling for Identifying Coexisting Condensation Rules in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.
    Zhan P
    J Intell; 2023 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 36976148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies.
    Ma W; Guo W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):370-392. PubMed ID: 30756389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measuring Skill Growth and Evaluating Change: Unconditional and Conditional Approaches to Latent Growth Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Lin Q; Xing K; Park YS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2205. PubMed ID: 33041889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.
    Ma W
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):167-181. PubMed ID: 32341605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Joint Testlet Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Paired Local Item Dependence in Response Times and Response Accuracy.
    Zhan P; Liao M; Bian Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():607. PubMed ID: 29922192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Diagnostic Classification Model for Forced-Choice Items and Noncognitive Tests.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):146-180. PubMed ID: 36601255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Theorems and Methods of a Complete Q Matrix With Attribute Hierarchies Under Restricted Q-Matrix Design.
    Cai Y; Tu D; Ding S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1413. PubMed ID: 30135672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using the iterative latent-class analysis approach to improve attribute accuracy in diagnostic classification models.
    Jiang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1075-1084. PubMed ID: 30843156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Attribute Discrimination Index-Based Method to Balance Attribute Coverage for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Wang Y; Sun X; Chong W; Xin T
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():224. PubMed ID: 32180747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Inferring conjunctive probabilities from noisy samples: evidence for the configural weighted average model.
    Jenny MA; Rieskamp J; Nilsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 24128388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.