144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29963538)
1. Comparative analysis of robot-assisted
Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW
Ann Surg Treat Res; 2018 Jul; 95(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 29963538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Alotaibi AM; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Park IJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 28357501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the technical and oncologic validity between robot-assisted and conventional open abdominoperineal resection.
Kim JC; Kwak JY; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim CW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 29(8):961-9. PubMed ID: 24913254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of low rectal cancer: A retrospective review of a single UK tertiary centre experience.
Hussain A; Mahmood F; Torrance ADW; Clarke H; Howitt C; Dawson R
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2018 Oct; 34():28-33. PubMed ID: 30191062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term Outcomes of an Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection in the Prone Position Compared With a Conventional Abdominoperineal Resection for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: The Early Experience at a Single Institution.
Park S; Hur H; Min BS; Kim NK
Ann Coloproctol; 2016 Feb; 32(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 26962531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.
Huang A; Zhao H; Ling T; Quan Y; Zheng M; Feng B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 24385025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with transabdominal levator transection.
Marecik SJ; Zawadzki M; Desouza AL; Park JJ; Abcarian H; Prasad LM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Oct; 54(10):1320-5. PubMed ID: 21904149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is extralevator abdominoperineal resection necessary for low rectal carcinoma in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy era?
Güven HE; Aksel B
Acta Chir Belg; 2020 Oct; 120(5):334-340. PubMed ID: 31250735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Open Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kim MJ; Park SC; Park JW; Chang HJ; Kim DY; Nam BH; Sohn DK; Oh JH
Ann Surg; 2018 Feb; 267(2):243-251. PubMed ID: 28549014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical Techniques for Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All.
Wilkins S; Yap R; Mendis S; Carne P; McMurrick PJ
Front Surg; 2022; 9():818097. PubMed ID: 35284486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Kim JH; Kim TW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Apr; 28(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23053680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
Hiranyakas A; da Silva G; Wexner SD; Ho YH; Allende D; Berho M
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 22776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Bong JW; Seo JH; Kim CW; Park SH; Kim J
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2082-2094. PubMed ID: 31332563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Perdawood SK; Lund T
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis in Experienced Centers.
Burghgraef TA; Crolla RMPH; Verheijen PM; Fahim M; van Geloven A; Leijtens JWA; Pronk A; Smits AB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Feb; 65(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34459449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open versus robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations in rectal cancer patients: techniques and comparison of outcomes between groups of 100 matched patients.
Kim JC; Yang SS; Jang TY; Kwak JY; Yun MJ; Lim SB
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Dec; 8(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 22893623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
