These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29963615)

  • 1. Illustrated versus non-illustrated anatomical test items in anatomy course tests and German Medical Licensing examinations (M1).
    Bahlmann O
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(2):Doc25. PubMed ID: 29963615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do item-writing flaws reduce examinations psychometric quality?
    Pais J; Silva A; Guimarães B; Povo A; Coelho E; Silva-Pereira F; Lourinho I; Ferreira MA; Severo M
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9(1):399. PubMed ID: 27516160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination.
    Vorstenbosch MA; Klaassen TP; Kooloos JG; Bolhuis SM; Laan RF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22674609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Educator Training or Experience Affect the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions?
    Webb EM; Phuong JS; Naeger DM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):1317-22. PubMed ID: 26277486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations.
    Ware J; Vik T
    Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18825568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
    Pham H; Trigg M; Wu S; O'Connell A; Harry C; Barnard J; Devitt P
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2018; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 30531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of MCQs from MOOCs for common item writing flaws.
    Costello E; Holland JC; Kirwan C
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Dec; 11(1):849. PubMed ID: 30509321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
    Sim SM; Rasiah RI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tips for developing a valid and reliable bank of multiple choice questions (MCQs).
    Sadaf S; Khan S; Ali SK
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2012; 25(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 23823639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of multiple choice practical examinations as an alternative to traditional free response examination formats in gross anatomy.
    Shaibah HS; van der Vleuten CP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 23109285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
    Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Is the formal quality of multiple choice questions used for continuing medical education influenced by guidelines for authors provided by the publishing houses?].
    Drossard S; Bauer D; Fischer M; Kühne-Eversmann L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Apr; 121():29-35. PubMed ID: 28416209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of multiple-choice tests in anatomy: common pitfalls and how to avoid them.
    Vahalia KV; Subramaniam K; Marks SC; De Souza EJ
    Clin Anat; 1995; 8(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 7697515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course.
    Melovitz Vasan CA; DeFouw DO; Holland BK; Vasan NS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28941215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.