These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29964039)

  • 1. How to Ensure Patient Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Your Practice.
    Hassan C; Kaminski MF; Repici A
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Aug; 155(2):252-257. PubMed ID: 29964039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proven Strategies for Increasing Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Butterly LF
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2020 Jul; 30(3):377-392. PubMed ID: 32439077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Creating and Implementing a National Public Health Campaign: The American Cancer Society's and National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable's 80% by 2018 Initiative.
    Wender RC; Doroshenk M; Brooks D; Hotz J; Smith RA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1739-1741. PubMed ID: 30413821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To Screen or Not to Screen Adults 45-49 Years of Age: That is the Question.
    Anderson JC; Samadder JN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1750-1753. PubMed ID: 30385833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Organisation.
    Malila N; Senore C; Armaroli P;
    Endoscopy; 2012 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():SE31-48. PubMed ID: 23012121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options.
    Issa IA; Noureddine M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jul; 23(28):5086-5096. PubMed ID: 28811705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do socioeconomic factors play a role in nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme?
    Hoeck S; van de Veerdonk W; De Brabander I
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(2):119-126. PubMed ID: 31724969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colorectal Cancer Health Disparities and the Role of US Law and Health Policy.
    Doubeni CA; Corley DA; Zauber AG
    Gastroenterology; 2016 May; 150(5):1052-1055. PubMed ID: 27016715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding Characteristics of Who Undergoes Testing Is Crucial for the Development of Diagnostic Strategies to Identify Individuals at Risk for Early-age Onset Colorectal Cancer.
    Vajravelu RK; Mehta SJ; Lewis JD;
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):993-998. PubMed ID: 33444572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Racing to stem a surge in early-onset colorectal cancer: After identifying a growing wave of early-onset colorectal cancer cases, researchers are hoping to investigate potential culprits and ramp up screening efforts.
    Nelson B
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Sep; 127(9):553-554. PubMed ID: 31503427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introduction to the 80% by 2018 Special Issue.
    Lacy BE; Spiegel B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1737-1738. PubMed ID: 30377308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Obese Adults.
    Seibert RG; Hanchate AD; Berz JP; Schroy PC
    Am J Prev Med; 2017 Aug; 53(2):e41-e49. PubMed ID: 28236517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey.
    Hong S; Suh M; Choi KS; Park B; Cha JM; Kim HS; Jun JK; Han DS
    Gut Liver; 2018 Jul; 12(4):426-432. PubMed ID: 29429156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy: Can We Get Our Recommendations to Stick?
    Rogers MC; Keswani RN
    Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Oct; 60(10):2855-6. PubMed ID: 26088369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. After a negative screening colonoscopy, a microsimulation model shows that currently recommended strategies are equally effective for rescreening.
    Imperiale TF
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Oct; 18(5):199-200. PubMed ID: 23389086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of colonoscopy.
    Allen JI
    Gastroenterology; 2014 Feb; 146(2):573-5. PubMed ID: 24579094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Introduction.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; von Karsa L;
    Endoscopy; 2012 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():SE15-30. PubMed ID: 23012118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Case for High-Quality Colonoscopy Remaining a Premier Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategy in the United States.
    Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2020 Jul; 30(3):527-540. PubMed ID: 32439086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Divergent understanding of health professionals regarding correct subsequent management of an asymptomatic patient with a positive faecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy with resultant cost implications.
    Beswick L; Ting A; Macrae F; Dowling D; Hair C
    Intern Med J; 2014 Dec; 44(12a):1264-5. PubMed ID: 25442767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The case for philanthropic investment to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: A novel paradigm to address a public health challenge.
    Carmeli A; Dranikoff L; Kundu A; Ladabaum U
    Cancer Med; 2020 Feb; 9(3):1220-1229. PubMed ID: 31808317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.