These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29964039)

  • 21. Improving on-time colorectal cancer screening through lead time messaging.
    Jones WF; Ahnen DJ; Schroy PC
    Cancer; 2020 Jan; 126(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 31568559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center.
    Kim KE; Randal F; Johnson M; Quinn M; Maene C; Hoover S; Richmond-Reese V; K L Tangka F; Joseph DA; Subramanian S
    Cancer; 2018 Nov; 124(21):4137-4144. PubMed ID: 30359474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy.
    Greenspan M; Chehl N; Shawron K; Barnes L; Li H; Avery E; Sims S; Losurdo J; Mobarhan S; Melson J
    Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Oct; 60(10):2930-6. PubMed ID: 25902746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Centralised faecal blood testing for both screening and pathology requests.
    Edwards JB
    Pathology; 2010 Dec; 42(7):700-4. PubMed ID: 21080891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Novel Coronavirus Disease-2019 Era.
    Dekker E; Chiu HM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I;
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Dec; 159(6):1998-2003. PubMed ID: 32966824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low Risk of Advanced Neoplasms for up to 20 Years After Negative Colonoscopy Result: Potential for Personalized Follow-up Screening Intervals.
    Heisser T; Guo F; Niedermaier T; Holleczek B; Hoffmeister M; Brenner H
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Dec; 159(6):2235-2237.e4. PubMed ID: 32777288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Refining the targeted population and achieving better for colorectal cancer screening.
    Zhou NY; Lin YX; Chen LX; Ye LS; Hu B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2024 Jul; 30(25):3140-3142. PubMed ID: 39006381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Colorectal cancer screening: for prevention or cure?
    Fletcher RH
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):505-6. PubMed ID: 19525246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physician perceptions of primary-care-based skin cancer screening in a Veterans Affairs pilot study.
    Shaub AR; Lewis ET; Nevedal AL; Swetter SM
    Br J Dermatol; 2019 Aug; 181(2):377-378. PubMed ID: 30695111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Organized colorectal cancer screening].
    Rouëssé J; Sancho-Garnier H;
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2014 Feb; 198(2):387-99. PubMed ID: 26263711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening: Early alert.
    Willyard C
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7551):S4-5. PubMed ID: 25970456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost-saving analysis of screening colonoscopy in Germany.
    Sieg A; Brenner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 17874356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines.
    Fisher JA; Fikry C; Troxel AB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 16434595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New trend in colorectal cancer in Germany: are young patients at increased risk for advanced colorectal cancer?
    Ambe PC; Jansen S; Zirngibl H
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):159. PubMed ID: 28835275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy.
    Magrath M; Yang E; Ahn C; Mayorga CA; Gopal P; Murphy CC; Gupta S; Agrawal D; Halm EA; Borton EK; Skinner CS; Singal AG
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1321-1328. PubMed ID: 30442733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Colorectal cancer screening from 45 years of age: Thesis, antithesis and synthesis.
    Mannucci A; Zuppardo RA; Rosati R; Leo MD; Perea J; Cavestro GM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(21):2565-2580. PubMed ID: 31210710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The toll of not screening for colorectal cancer.
    Chen C; Hoffmeister M; Brenner H
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 27897033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The cost-effectiveness of training US primary care physicians to conduct colorectal cancer screening in family medicine residency programs.
    Edwardson N; Bolin JN; McClellan DA; Nash PP; Helduser JW
    Prev Med; 2016 Apr; 85():98-105. PubMed ID: 26872393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Methods to increase participation in cancer screening programmes].
    Giorgi Rossi P; Camilloni L; Cogo C; Federici A; Ferroni E; Furnari G; Giordano L; Grazzini G; Iossa A; Jimenez B; Palazzi M; Palazzo F; Spadea T; Senore C; Borgia P; Guasticchi G
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012 Jan; 36(1 Suppl 1):1-104. PubMed ID: 22418841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.