These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29965864)

  • 21. Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users.
    Zekveld AA; Pronk M; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):762-775. PubMed ID: 29450534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Musicians at the Cocktail Party: Neural Substrates of Musical Training During Selective Listening in Multispeaker Situations.
    Puschmann S; Baillet S; Zatorre RJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 Jul; 29(8):3253-3265. PubMed ID: 30137239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Musical training shapes neural responses to melodic and prosodic expectation.
    Zioga I; Di Bernardi Luft C; Bhattacharya J
    Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():267-282. PubMed ID: 27622645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No Musician Advantage in the Perception of Degraded-Fundamental Frequency Speech in Noisy Environments.
    Hsieh IH; Guo YJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 66(8):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 37499233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech.
    Boebinger D; Evans S; Rosen S; Lima CF; Manly T; Scott SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):378-87. PubMed ID: 25618067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Papakonstantinou A; Strelcyk O; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 21354285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can You Hear Out the Melody? Testing Musical Scene Perception in Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Siedenburg K; Röttges S; Wagener KC; Hohmann V
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520945826. PubMed ID: 32895034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners.
    Schoof T; Rosen S
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2014; 6():307. PubMed ID: 25429266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise.
    Ruggles DR; Freyman RL; Oxenham AJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86980. PubMed ID: 24489819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of auditory cognition in 5- to 10-year-old children: Focus on musical and verbal short-term memory.
    Ginzburg J; Moulin A; Fornoni L; Talamini F; Tillmann B; Caclin A
    Dev Sci; 2022 May; 25(3):e13188. PubMed ID: 34751481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Standard-interval size affects interval-discrimination thresholds for pure-tone melodic pitch intervals.
    McClaskey CM
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():64-69. PubMed ID: 28935162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural synchronization is strongest to the spectral flux of slow music and depends on familiarity and beat salience.
    Weineck K; Wen OX; Henry MJ
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36094165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
    Besser J; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):75-93. PubMed ID: 23945955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.