These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29966098)

  • 1. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Reference Energies and Benchmarks.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Blondel A; Garniron Y; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Aug; 14(8):4360-4379. PubMed ID: 29966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Medium Sized Molecules.
    Loos PF; Lipparini F; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1711-1741. PubMed ID: 31986042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Bicyclic Systems.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem A; 2021 Dec; 125(47):10174-10188. PubMed ID: 34792354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations.
    Loos PF; Comin M; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3666-3686. PubMed ID: 33955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference Energies for Double Excitations.
    Loos PF; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):1939-1956. PubMed ID: 30689951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3.
    Sauer SP; Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Thiel W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Mar; 5(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 26610222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemically Accurate 0-0 Energies with Not-so-Accurate Excited State Geometries.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2481-2491. PubMed ID: 30802404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-Comparisons between Experiment, TD-DFT, CC, and ADC for Transition Energies.
    Suellen C; Freitas RG; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4581-4590. PubMed ID: 31265781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excitation Energies in Diffuse Basis Sets.
    Kánnár D; Tajti A; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):202-209. PubMed ID: 27959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Exotic Molecules and Radicals.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Boggio-Pasqua M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Jun; 16(6):3720-3736. PubMed ID: 32379442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Oscillator Strengths and Dipole Moments of Small Molecules.
    Chrayteh A; Blondel A; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jan; 17(1):416-438. PubMed ID: 33256412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking Correlated Methods for Frequency-Dependent Polarizabilities: Aromatic Molecules with the CC3, CCSD, CC2, SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), and SOPPA(CCSD) Methods.
    Jørgensen MW; Faber R; Ligabue A; Sauer SPA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 May; 16(5):3006-3018. PubMed ID: 32302474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is ADC(3) as Accurate as CC3 for Valence and Rydberg Transition Energies?
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 Feb; 11(3):974-980. PubMed ID: 31913639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the Key for Accurate Absorption and Emission Calculations, Energy or Geometry?
    Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Mar; 14(3):1534-1543. PubMed ID: 29365256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the CC(P;Q) Hierarchy of Coupled-Cluster Methods to the Beryllium Dimer.
    Magoulas I; Bauman NP; Shen J; Piecuch P
    J Phys Chem A; 2018 Feb; 122(5):1350-1368. PubMed ID: 29286672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmark Calculations of K-Edge Ionization Energies for First-Row Elements Using Scalar-Relativistic Core-Valence-Separated Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Methods.
    Liu J; Matthews D; Coriani S; Cheng L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):1642-1651. PubMed ID: 30702889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3.
    Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(13):134110. PubMed ID: 18397056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States.
    Kánnár D; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Sep; 10(9):3757-65. PubMed ID: 26588520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate Excited-State Geometries: A CASPT2 and Coupled-Cluster Reference Database for Small Molecules.
    Budzák Š; Scalmani G; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):6237-6252. PubMed ID: 29140697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approximations to complete basis set-extrapolated, highly correlated non-covalent interaction energies.
    Mackie ID; DiLabio GA
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(13):134318. PubMed ID: 21992316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.