354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29966490)
1. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data.
Wynants L; Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Moerbeek M; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1406-14. PubMed ID: 25817942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable.
Ogundimu EO; Altman DG; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():175-82. PubMed ID: 26964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure.
Courvoisier DS; Combescure C; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 21411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models.
Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):796-808. PubMed ID: 25411322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of likelihood penalization and variance decomposition approaches for clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
Lohmann A; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M
Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200108. PubMed ID: 37199142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models.
de Jong VMT; Eijkemans MJC; van Calster B; Timmerman D; Moons KGM; Steyerberg EW; van Smeden M
Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 30614028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression.
Pate A; Riley RD; Collins GS; van Smeden M; Van Calster B; Ensor J; Martin GP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):555-571. PubMed ID: 36660777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.
Peduzzi P; Concato J; Kemper E; Holford TR; Feinstein AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 49(12):1373-9. PubMed ID: 8970487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study.
Van Calster B; van Smeden M; De Cock B; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3166-3178. PubMed ID: 32401702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach.
Olvera Astivia OL; Gadermann A; Guhn M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 31072299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of hyperparameter tuning procedures for clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
Dunias ZS; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Boulesteix AL; van Smeden M
Stat Med; 2024 Mar; 43(6):1119-1134. PubMed ID: 38189632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size calculation to externally validate scoring systems based on logistic regression models.
Palazón-Bru A; Folgado-de la Rosa DM; Cortés-Castell E; López-Cascales MT; Gil-Guillén VF
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176726. PubMed ID: 28459847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of predictor measurement heterogeneity across settings on the performance of prediction models: A measurement error perspective.
Luijken K; Groenwold RHH; Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW; van Smeden M
Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3444-3459. PubMed ID: 31148207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing clinical prediction models when adhering to minimum sample size recommendations: The importance of quantifying bootstrap variability in tuning parameters and predictive performance.
Martin GP; Riley RD; Collins GS; Sperrin M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2545-2561. PubMed ID: 34623193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of using multiple stepwise algorithms for variable selection.
Wiegand RE
Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1647-59. PubMed ID: 20552568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Ensor J; Archer L; Booth S; Mozumder SI; Rutherford MJ; van Smeden M; Lambert PC; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1280-1295. PubMed ID: 34915593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
