214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29966707)
1. High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Measures Are More Accurate Than Conventional Measures in Detecting Anal Hypocontractility in Women With Fecal Incontinence.
Carrington EV; Knowles CH; Grossi U; Scott SM
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 17(3):477-485.e9. PubMed ID: 29966707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.
Chakraborty S; Feuerhak KJ; Zinsmeister AR; Bharucha AE
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Mar; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 27696628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D High-definition anorectal manometry: Values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD).
Mion F; Garros A; Brochard C; Vitton V; Ropert A; Bouvier M; Damon H; Siproudhis L; Roman S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Aug; 29(8):. PubMed ID: 28251732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic evaluation of cough-anorectal pressure responses in health and in fecal incontinence: A high-resolution anorectal manometry study.
Rasijeff AMP; Garcia-Zermeno K; Carrington EV; Knowles C; Scott SM
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Mar; 33(3):e13999. PubMed ID: 33150700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Redundancy in the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group Manometry Protocol: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Fecal Incontinence.
Ang D; Vollebregt P; Carrington EV; Knowles CH; Scott SM
Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(3):964-970. PubMed ID: 33939154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Predictive Model to Identify Patients With Fecal Incontinence Based on High-Definition Anorectal Manometry.
Zifan A; Ledgerwood-Lee M; Mittal RK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 14(12):1788-1796.e2. PubMed ID: 27464594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anal sphincter function as assessed by 3D high definition anorectal manometry.
Mion F; Garros A; Subtil F; Damon H; Roman S
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 42(4):378-381. PubMed ID: 29551608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survey of anal sphincter dysfunction using anal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence: a possible guide to therapy.
Mandaliya R; DiMarino AJ; Moleski S; Rattan S; Cohen S
Ann Gastroenterol; 2015; 28(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 26423466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anal endosonography and manometry: comparison in patients with defecation problems.
Schäfer R; Heyer T; Gantke B; Schäfer A; Frieling T; Häussinger D; Enck P
Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Mar; 40(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 9118743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosing anal sphincter injury with transanal ultrasound and manometry.
Sentovich SM; Blatchford GJ; Rivela LJ; Lin K; Thorson AG; Christensen MA
Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Dec; 40(12):1430-4. PubMed ID: 9407980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of anorectal manometry measures to severity of fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations - a cross-sectional study.
Bjørsum-Meyer T; Christensen P; Jakobsen MS; Baatrup G; Qvist N
Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6016. PubMed ID: 32265467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IS DIGITAL RECTAL EXAM RELIABLE IN GRADING ANAL SPHINCTER DEFECTS?
Coura MM; Silva SM; Almeida RM; Forrest MC; Sousa JB
Arq Gastroenterol; 2016; 53(4):240-245. PubMed ID: 27706453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anorectal pressure gradient and rectal compliance in fecal incontinence.
Rasmussen OO; Rønholt C; Alstrup N; Christiansen J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 1998; 13(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 9810518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of longitudinal and radial characteristics of intra-anal pressures using 3D high-definition anorectal manometry between children with anoretal malformations and functional constipation.
Ambartsumyan L; Shaffer M; Carlin K; Nurko S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Feb; 33(2):e13971. PubMed ID: 32902923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical benefit of high resolution anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal function after intersphincteric resection.
Kitaguchi D; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T; Tsukada Y; Ito M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Mar; 21(3):335-341. PubMed ID: 30537066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pudendal nerve damage increases the risk of fecal incontinence in women with anal sphincter rupture after childbirth.
Tetzschner T; Sørensen M; Rasmussen OO; Lose G; Christiansen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Jul; 74(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 7604686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry: does it allow automated analysis of sphincter defects?
Benezech A; Behr M; Bouvier M; Grimaud JC; Vitton V
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 17(10):O202-7. PubMed ID: 26046765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IS THE PHYSICIAN EXPERTISE IN DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION OF VALUE IN DETECTING ANAL TONE IN COMPARISON TO ANORECTAL MANOMETRY?
Pinto RA; Corrêa Neto IJF; Nahas SC; Froehner Junior I; Soares DFM; Cecconello I
Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 31141075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic value of the functional lumen imaging probe versus high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence.
Leroi AM; Melchior C; Charpentier C; Bridoux V; Savoye-Collet C; Houivet E; Ducrotté P; Gourcerol G
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Jun; 30(6):e13291. PubMed ID: 29345097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system.
Attari A; Chey WD; Baker JR; Ashton-Miller JA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0228761. PubMed ID: 32991595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
