These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29967901)

  • 1. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
    Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
    Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery.
    Smitkarn P; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Sep; 46(9):949-957. PubMed ID: 31241782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective study of the accuracy of template-guided versus freehand implant placement: A nonradiologic method.
    Alevizakos V; Mitov G; Stoetzer M; von See C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 128(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31227455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique.
    Zhao XZ; Xu WH; Tang ZH; Wu MJ; Zhu J; Chen S
    Chin J Dent Res; 2014; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Schneider D; Sancho-Puchades M; Mir-Marí J; Mühlemann S; Jung R; Hämmerle C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision and trueness of implant placement with and without static surgical guides: An in vitro study.
    Guentsch A; Sukhtankar L; An H; Luepke PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 32893013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of template-based guided dental implant placement-An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods.
    Sium-Abel A; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Bourauel C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):864-875. PubMed ID: 38629760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Marchetti M; Scarfò B; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 25237668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study.
    Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
    Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers?
    Deeb GR; Allen RK; Hall VP; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Bencharit S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted template-guided custom-designed 3D-printed implant placement with custom-designed 3D-printed surgical tooling: an in-vitro proof of a novel concept.
    Anssari Moin D; Derksen W; Waars H; Hassan B; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):582-585. PubMed ID: 26992477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.