203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968079)
1. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
Chen Z; Cave KR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
Biggs AT; Gibson BS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
He C; Chen A
Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
Lavie N; Ro T; Russell C
Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12930485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual salience can co-exist with dilution during visual selection.
Biggs AT; Gibson BS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 23937214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.
Benoni H; Tsal Y
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similar distraction, but differential suppression, for faces and non-face objects: Evidence from behaviour and event-related potentials.
Neumann MF; Viska CG; van Huis S; Palermo R
Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():39-46. PubMed ID: 30292783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual load corresponds with factors known to influence visual search.
Roper ZJ; Cosman JD; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 23398258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.
Mevorach C; Tsal Y; Humphreys GW
Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():966. PubMed ID: 24454297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.
Elliott JC; Giesbrecht B
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21097855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Auditory Distractors on Speech Recognition and Listening Effort.
Gustafson SJ; Nelson L; Silcox JW
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1121-1132. PubMed ID: 36935395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
Lavie N; Torralbo A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.
Sato S; Kawahara JI
Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 25030814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluative pressure overcomes perceptual load effects.
Normand A; Autin F; Croizet JC
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):737-42. PubMed ID: 25233881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom.
Cave KR; Chen Z
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1822-38. PubMed ID: 27250363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
