These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968079)

  • 1. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
    Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
    He C; Chen A
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
    Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
    Lavie N; Ro T; Russell C
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12930485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual salience can co-exist with dilution during visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 23937214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.
    Benoni H; Tsal Y
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similar distraction, but differential suppression, for faces and non-face objects: Evidence from behaviour and event-related potentials.
    Neumann MF; Viska CG; van Huis S; Palermo R
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():39-46. PubMed ID: 30292783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual load corresponds with factors known to influence visual search.
    Roper ZJ; Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 23398258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.
    Mevorach C; Tsal Y; Humphreys GW
    Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():966. PubMed ID: 24454297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
    Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.
    Elliott JC; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21097855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Auditory Distractors on Speech Recognition and Listening Effort.
    Gustafson SJ; Nelson L; Silcox JW
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1121-1132. PubMed ID: 36935395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
    Lavie N; Torralbo A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.
    Sato S; Kawahara JI
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 25030814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluative pressure overcomes perceptual load effects.
    Normand A; Autin F; Croizet JC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):737-42. PubMed ID: 25233881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom.
    Cave KR; Chen Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1822-38. PubMed ID: 27250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.