These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968079)

  • 21. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.
    Töllner T; Conci M; Müller HJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Mar; 36(3):935-44. PubMed ID: 25351495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder.
    Remington A; Swettenham J; Campbell R; Coleman M
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1388-93. PubMed ID: 19843262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing.
    He X; Liu W; Qin N; Lyu L; Dong X; Bao M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Dec; 58(12):e13920. PubMed ID: 34383329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of acute stress and perceptual load on distractor interference.
    Sato H; Takenaka I; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 22463388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reconceptualizing perceptual load as a rate problem: The role of time in the allocation of selective attention.
    Li Z; Xin K; Li W; Li Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1458-1471. PubMed ID: 29708380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Face and object encoding under perceptual load: ERP evidence.
    Neumann MF; Mohamed TN; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(4):3021-7. PubMed ID: 21044688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional spread in deaf and hearing participants: face and object distractor processing under perceptual load.
    Hauthal N; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1312-20. PubMed ID: 22638944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Top-down control of attention under varying task loads.
    Jo S; Kim JY; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 May; 216():103310. PubMed ID: 33892264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Top-down deactivation of interference from irrelevant spatial or verbal stimulus features.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2360-74. PubMed ID: 24980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.
    Eayrs JO; Kukkonen N; Prutean N; Steendam ST; Boehler CN; Wiersema JR; Krebs RM; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jul; 50(7):769-784. PubMed ID: 38722582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.
    Tsal Y; Benoni H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1645-56. PubMed ID: 20822300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Later but not early stages of familiar face recognition depend strongly on attentional resources: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Wiese H; Ingram BT; Elley ML; Tüttenberg SC; Burton AM; Young AW
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():147-158. PubMed ID: 31310964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The persistence of distraction: a study of attentional biases by fear, faces, and context.
    Parks EL; Kim SY; Hopfinger JB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1501-8. PubMed ID: 24696390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing.
    Murphy S; Fraenkel N; Dalton P
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 23969299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.