These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968079)

  • 41. N250r ERP repetition effects from distractor faces when attending to another face under load: Evidence for a face attention resource.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():64-77. PubMed ID: 19306855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():327. PubMed ID: 23761777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay JM; Blythe HI
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Early and Late Electrophysiological Effects of Distractor Frequency in Picture Naming: Reconciling Input and Output Accounts.
    Riès SK; Fraser D; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1936-47. PubMed ID: 26042502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference.
    Chen Z
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):888-900. PubMed ID: 14528898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implicit learning modulates selective attention at sensory levels of perceptual processing.
    Couperus JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 19304623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Threat distractor and perceptual load modulate test-retest reliability of anterior cingulate cortex response.
    Bunford N; Kinney KL; Michael J; Klumpp H
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2017 Jul; 77():120-127. PubMed ID: 28408292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Predicting moment-to-moment attentional state.
    Rosenberg MD; Finn ES; Constable RT; Chun MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 114():249-56. PubMed ID: 25800207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
    Zhang W; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How does searching for faces among similar-looking distractors affect distractor memory?
    McKinley GL; Peterson DJ; Hout MC
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 36849759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.
    Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):451-68. PubMed ID: 7790827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Temporal dissociation between distractors and targets: the impact of residual distractor processing on target responses.
    Kritikos A; McNeill J; Pavlis A
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Jan; 40(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18316295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers.
    Cosman JD; Mordkoff JT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 27854456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load.
    Gupta R; Hur YJ; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2016 Apr; 16(3):328-37. PubMed ID: 26479771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Greater Response Interference to Pain Faces Under Low Perceptual Load Conditions in Adolescents With Impairing Pain: A Role for Poor Attention Control Mechanisms in Pain Disability?
    Lau JYF; Sprecher E; Haas S; Lisk S; Pagliaccio D; Sharpe L; Bar-Haim Y; Pine DS
    J Pain; 2019 Apr; 20(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 30385320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Vieth HE; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2325-39. PubMed ID: 24830335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.