528 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968080)
21. Statistical regularities across trials bias attentional selection.
Li AS; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):860-870. PubMed ID: 32324032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. "Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression": Correction to Failing et al. (2019).
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1303. PubMed ID: 31556687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
Huang C; Donk M; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):443-457. PubMed ID: 35324244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning.
Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J; Bogaerts L
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2437-2451. PubMed ID: 37491558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
Berry JH
Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nonspatial interdimensional attentional capture.
Inukai T; Kawahara J; Kumada T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 20348572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.
Tseng CH; Jingling L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124190. PubMed ID: 25909986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Statistical learning of spatiotemporal regularities dynamically guides visual attention across space.
Xu Z; Theeuwes J; Los SA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1054-1072. PubMed ID: 36207663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Statistical Learning of Distractor Suppression Downregulates Prestimulus Neural Excitability in Early Visual Cortex.
Ferrante O; Zhigalov A; Hickey C; Jensen O
J Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 43(12):2190-2198. PubMed ID: 36801825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatial enhancement due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
Zhang Y; Yang Y; Wang B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1077-1086. PubMed ID: 35426029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]