These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search. Barras C; Kerzel D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition? Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Flexible weighting of target features based on distractor context. Lee J; Geng JJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):739-751. PubMed ID: 31741317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues. Lin Z; Lu ZL; He S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2185-98. PubMed ID: 27068051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Feature-blind attentional suppression of salient distractors. Ma X; Abrams RA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1409-1424. PubMed ID: 37118222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming. Cho SA; Cho YS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P Kerzel D; Burra N J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons. Theeuwes J; De Vries GJ; Godijn R Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):735-46. PubMed ID: 12956581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities. Damsma A; Taatgen N; de Jong R; van Rijn H Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1136-1149. PubMed ID: 31485992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning. Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search. Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature. Kerzel D; Barras C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]