These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968084)

  • 21. Attention restores discrete items to visual short-term memory.
    Murray AM; Nobre AC; Clark IA; Cravo AM; Stokes MG
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 23436786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prioritization sharpens working memories but does not protect them from distraction.
    Zhang Z; Lewis-Peacock JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Apr; 152(4):1158-1174. PubMed ID: 36395057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. No evidence that the retro-cue benefit requires reallocation of memory resources.
    Lin YT; Fougnie D
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105230. PubMed ID: 36007468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory.
    Parmentier FB; Tremblay S; Jones DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 15260195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can valuable information be prioritized in verbal working memory?
    Atkinson AL; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Waterman AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 May; 47(5):747-764. PubMed ID: 33136420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Internal attention is the only retroactive mechanism for controlling precision in working memory.
    Serin F; Günseli E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1375-1386. PubMed ID: 36536206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.
    Makovski T; Pertzov Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1735-43. PubMed ID: 25980784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Free-recall benefit, inhomogeneity and between-item interference in working memory.
    Hao Y; Li X; Zhang H; Ku Y
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104739. PubMed ID: 33901834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task-irrelevant financial losses inhibit the removal of information from working memory.
    Fallon SJ; Dolfen N; Parolo F; Zokaei N; Husain M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1673. PubMed ID: 30737421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can children prioritize more valuable information in working memory? An exploration into the effects of motivation and memory load.
    Atkinson AL; Waterman AH; Allen RJ
    Dev Psychol; 2019 May; 55(5):967-980. PubMed ID: 30816725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Learned reward association improves visual working memory.
    Gong M; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):841-56. PubMed ID: 24392741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?
    Atkinson AL; Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):115-126. PubMed ID: 29635690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Where to start? Bottom-up attention improves working memory by determining encoding order.
    Ravizza SM; Uitvlugt MG; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 27505226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The limits of visual working memory in children: Exploring prioritization and recency effects with sequential presentation.
    Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
    Dev Psychol; 2018 Feb; 54(2):240-253. PubMed ID: 29154649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():20-31. PubMed ID: 25557544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.