289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968136)
21. An In-Vitro Comparison of Mixed Reality Navigation to Traditional Freehand and Patient Specific Instrumentation Techniques for Glenoid Guide Pin Insertion during Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Fleet CT; Gao R; Johnson JA; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38908464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.
Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 27592372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Mehta MP; Vogel LA; Shiu BB; Dennis ER; Petkovic D; Levine WN; Jobin CM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 29759906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of a custom alignment guide to improve glenoid component position in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Suero EM; Citak M; Lo D; Krych AJ; Craig EV; Pearle AD
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Dec; 21(12):2860-6. PubMed ID: 22932691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of patient-specific guided glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Levy JC; Everding NG; Frankle MA; Keppler LJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Oct; 23(10):1563-7. PubMed ID: 24739791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer navigation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical trial to evaluate the learning curve.
Wang AW; Hayes A; Gibbons R; Mackie KE
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Mar; 29(3):617-623. PubMed ID: 31648783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis of implant position following total shoulder arthroplasty.
Ricchetti ET; Jun BJ; Cain RA; Youderian A; Rodriguez EJ; Kusin D; Subhas N; Patterson TE; Iannotti JP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jun; 27(6):983-992. PubMed ID: 29426742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 3D navigated implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Feasibility and results in an anatomic study.
Stübig T; Petri M; Zeckey C; Hawi N; Krettek C; Citak M; Meller R
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Dec; 9(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 23908109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Heylen S; Van Haver A; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Feb; 25(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 26456430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Generic targeting guides place revision glenoid components in more anatomic version than traditional techniques.
Mulligan RP; Azar FM; Throckmorton TW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 May; 26(5):786-791. PubMed ID: 27765502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High intraoperative accuracy and low complication rate of computer-assisted navigation of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Larose G; Greene AT; Jung A; Polakovic SV; Davis NZ; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jun; 32(6S):S39-S45. PubMed ID: 36681107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional measures of posterior bone loss and retroversion in Walch B2 glenoids predict the need for an augmented anatomic glenoid component.
Cronin KJ; Kirsch JM; Gates S; Patel MS; Joyce CD; Hill BW; Gutman MJ; Williams GR; Namdari S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2386-2392. PubMed ID: 33753274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial.
Hendel MD; Bryan JA; Barsoum WK; Rodriguez EJ; Brems JJ; Evans PJ; Iannotti JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2167-75. PubMed ID: 23224387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.
Boileau P; Cheval D; Gauci MO; Holzer N; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29298261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of glenoid wear pattern on glenoid component placement accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty.
Hao KA; Sutton CD; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Wright JO; Struk AM; Haupt ET; Leonor T; King JJ
JSES Int; 2022 Mar; 6(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 35252914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patient Posture Affects Simulated ROM in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Modeling Study Using Preoperative Planning Software.
Moroder P; Urvoy M; Raiss P; Werthel JD; Akgün D; Chaoui J; Siegert P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):619-631. PubMed ID: 34669618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Experimental guide wire placement for total shoulder arthroplasty in glenoid models: higher precision for patient-specific aiming guides compared to standard technique without learning curve.
Schader JF; Helfen T; Braunstein V; Ockert B; Haasters F; Hertel R; Südkamp N; Milz S; Sprecher CM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Jun; 25(1):449. PubMed ID: 38844899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software.
Reid JJ; Kunkle BF; Greene AT; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 34411724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Advanced Templating for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Gannon NP; Wise KL; Knudsen ML
JBJS Rev; 2021 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 33735155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
