These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29968157)

  • 1. Stomach interference in
    Rasmussen T; Kjær A; Hasbak P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1934-1942. PubMed ID: 29968157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection and severity classification of extracardiac interference in ⁸²Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Orton EJ; Al Harbi I; Klein R; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA; Glenn Wells R
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102501. PubMed ID: 25281976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?
    Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.
    Dorbala S; Hachamovitch R; Curillova Z; Thomas D; Vangala D; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):846-54. PubMed ID: 19608135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of sex on risk stratification with stress myocardial perfusion Rb-82 positron emission tomography: Results from the PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Prognosis Multicenter Registry.
    Kay J; Dorbala S; Goyal A; Fazel R; Di Carli MF; Einstein AJ; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Chow BJ; Min JK; Berman DS; Shah S; Bellam N; Butler J; Shaw LJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 62(20):1866-76. PubMed ID: 23850903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia.
    Juneau D; Wu KY; Kaps N; Yao J; Renaud JM; Beanlands RSB; Ruddy TD; deKemp RA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):835-850. PubMed ID: 33389638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; Yam Y; Kansal V; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Chen L; Ruddy TD; Germano G; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJW
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):538-548. PubMed ID: 29177706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left ventricular function in response to dipyridamole stress: head-to-head comparison between
    Giorgi MC; Meneghetti JC; Soares J; Izaki M; Falcão A; Imada R; Chalela W; de Oliveira MA; Nomura C; Verberne HJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 May; 44(5):876-885. PubMed ID: 27987028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET.
    Dantas RN; Assuncao AN; Marques IA; Fahel MG; Nomura CH; Avila LFR; Giorgi MCP; Soares J; Meneghetti JC; Parga JR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 29352381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical interpretation standards and quality assurance for the multicenter PET/CT trial rubidium-ARMI.
    Renaud JM; Mylonas I; McArdle B; Dowsley T; Yip K; Turcotte E; Guimond J; Trottier M; Pibarot P; Maguire C; Lalonde L; Gulenchyn K; Wisenberg G; Wells RG; Ruddy T; Chow B; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 55(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 24249797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with
    Klein R; Ocneanu A; Renaud JM; Ziadi MC; Beanlands RSB; deKemp RA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 25(3):929-941. PubMed ID: 27804067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of attenuation, dual-energy-window, and model-based scatter correction of low-count SPECT to 82Rb PET/CT quantified myocardial perfusion scores.
    Wells RG; Soueidan K; Timmins R; Ruddy TD
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 20(5):785-96. PubMed ID: 23737161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study.
    Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of proton pump inhibitors on Rubidium-82 gastric uptake using positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Alzahrani AH; Arasaratnam P; Massalha S; Alenazy A; Lee A; Clarkin O; deKemp RA; Hossain A; Beanlands RS; Ruddy TD; Chow BJW
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 31768902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.
    Bateman TM; Heller GV; McGhie AI; Friedman JD; Case JA; Bryngelson JR; Hertenstein GK; Moutray KL; Reid K; Cullom SJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2006; 13(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 16464714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of stress only rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
    McMahon SR; Kikut J; Pinckney RG; Keating FK
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1069-75. PubMed ID: 23955287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transient ischemic dilation ratio in 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging: normal values and significance as a diagnostic and prognostic marker.
    Rischpler C; Higuchi T; Fukushima K; Javadi MS; Merrill J; Nekolla SG; Bravo PE; Bengel FM
    J Nucl Med; 2012 May; 53(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22492731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
    Chow BJ; Ananthasubramaniam K; dekemp RA; Dalipaj MM; Beanlands RS; Ruddy TD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Apr; 45(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 15837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of PET myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients.
    Chow BJ; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Pencina MJ; Yam Y; Chen L; Anand SP; Ruddy TD; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Beanlands RS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 7(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 24560212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by computed tomography in patients with refractory angina: a head-to-head comparison with quantitative rubidium-82 positron emission tomography as reference.
    Qayyum AA; Kühl JT; Kjaer A; Hasbak P; Kofoed KF; Kastrup J
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 26625937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.