158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29969950)
1. Midterm results of the cylindrical fully porous-coated uncemented femoral stem in revision patients with Paprosky I-IIIA femoral defects.
Ahmet S; İsmet KÖ; Mehmet E; Eren Y; Remzi T; Önder Y
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018783906. PubMed ID: 29969950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions?
Tetreault MW; Shukla SK; Yi PH; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83. PubMed ID: 23846608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.
Otero JE; Martin JR; Rowe TM; Odum SM; Mason JB
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1069-1073. PubMed ID: 31870582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extensively Porous-Coated Stems Demonstrate Excellent Long-Term Survivorship in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Dagneaux L; Sculco PK; Haight HJ; Larson DR; Howard JL; Abdel MP; Berry DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S217-S222. PubMed ID: 36907385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prostheses are effective in treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A retrospective mid- to long-term follow-up study.
Wang Q; Li D; Kang P
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019857653. PubMed ID: 31232172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Megaprostheses in the Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Series and Literature Review.
Artiaco S; Boggio F; Colzani G; Titolo P; Zoccola K; Bianchi P; Bellomo F
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 26630464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral bone loss using tapered rectangular femoral stem: a minimum 10 years' follow-up.
Wang J; Dai WL; Lin ZM; Shi ZJ
Hip Int; 2020 Sep; 30(5):622-628. PubMed ID: 32686507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up.
Kang JS; Na Y; Ko BS; Jeon YS
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(3):2309499018812241. PubMed ID: 30449250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.
Lakstein D; Backstein D; Safir O; Kosashvili Y; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 May; 468(5):1310-5. PubMed ID: 19533262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery - Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients].
Schmolders J; Koob S; Schepers P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Pennekamp PH; Strauss AC
Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Feb; 155(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27632667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision].
Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].
Pavelka T; Salášek M; Weisová D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 28253947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modern Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem.
Wallace CN; Chang JS; Kayani B; Moriarty PD; Tahmassebi JE; Haddad FS
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3697-3702. PubMed ID: 32713726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
