290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29970100)
1. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Jiang Y; Yuan J
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 29970100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perineural invasion as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang LJ; Wu B; Zha ZL; Qu W; Zhao H; Yuan J; Feng YJ
BMC Urol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 29390991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; John H; Catterwell R; Selth LA; Callaghan MO
BJU Int; 2021 May; 127 Suppl 1():13-22. PubMed ID: 33973331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Yuan J; Jiang Y; Yang W
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1803-1815. PubMed ID: 29766319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do Second Primary Cancers Affect the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Kang M; Jung JW; Oh JJ; Lee S; Hong SK; Lee SE; Byun SS
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2016 Aug; 14(4):e363-9. PubMed ID: 27105723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Srougi V; Bessa J; Baghdadi M; Nunes-Silva I; da Costa JB; Garcia-Barreras S; Barret E; Rozet F; Galiano M; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 28243789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Length of site-specific positive surgical margins as a risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hsu M; Chang SL; Ferrari M; Nolley R; Presti JC; Brooks JD
Int J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21342296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; Lim A; Catterwell R; Selth L; O'Callaghan M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):673-680. PubMed ID: 36859711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic Value of Gleason Score at Positive Surgical Margin in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lysenko I; Mori K; Mostafaei H; Enikeev DV; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Quhal F; Janisch F; Shariat SF
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Oct; 18(5):e517-e522. PubMed ID: 32229268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
