269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29970631)
1. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial susceptibility and cytotoxicity of husk extract of
Kohli D; Hugar SM; Bhat KG; Shah PP; Mundada MV; Badakar CM
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2018; 36(2):142-150. PubMed ID: 29970631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against selected single-species biofilms.
Sena NT; Gomes BP; Vianna ME; Berber VB; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; Souza-Filho FJ
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):878-85. PubMed ID: 17014526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite.
Vianna ME; Gomes BP; Berber VB; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; de Souza-Filho FJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jan; 97(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14716261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of berberine, an antimicrobial plant alkaloid, as an endodontic irrigant against a mixed-culture biofilm in an in vitro tooth model.
Xie Q; Johnson BR; Wenckus CS; Fayad MI; Wu CD
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1114-7. PubMed ID: 22794217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Duration-dependent susceptibility of endodontic pathogens to calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidene gel used as intracanal medicament: an in vitro evaluation.
Neelakantan P; Sanjeev K; Subbarao CV
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e138-41. PubMed ID: 17689115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis with Chlorhexidine against Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study.
Akca AE; Akca G; Topçu FT; Macit E; Pikdöken L; Özgen IŞ
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():3627463. PubMed ID: 26949701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of antibiotic medicaments against biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis and Porphyromonas gingivalis.
Sabrah AH; Yassen GH; Gregory RL
J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1385-9. PubMed ID: 24139259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by two different tests.
Sassone LM; Fidel RA; Murad CF; Fidel SR; Hirata R
Aust Endod J; 2008 Apr; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18352899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gel, chlorhexidine solution and sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigants.
Ferraz CC; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
Braz Dent J; 2007; 18(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 18278298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antimicrobial activities of natural plant compounds against endodontic pathogens and biocompatibility with human gingival fibroblasts.
Marcoux E; Lagha AB; Gauthier P; Grenier D
Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Aug; 116():104734. PubMed ID: 32454322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine gel used as intracanal medicament.
Gomes BP; Vianna ME; Sena NT; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; de Souza Filho FJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Oct; 102(4):544-50. PubMed ID: 16997123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antibacterial Effect of Azadirachta indica (Neem) or Curcuma longa (Turmeric) against Enterococcus faecalis Compared with That of 5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine in vitro.
Joy Sinha D; D S Nandha K; Jaiswal N; Vasudeva A; Prabha Tyagi S; Pratap Singh U
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2017; 58(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 28724858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial effect of MTAD, Tetraclean, Cloreximid, and sodium hypochlorite on three common endodontic pathogens.
Giardino L; Savoldi E; Ambu E; Rimondini R; Palezona A; Debbia EA
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):391. PubMed ID: 19884734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial effect and pH of chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide alone and associated with other materials.
de Souza-Filho FJ; Soares Ade J; Vianna ME; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; Gomes BP
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 18438556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation on antimicrobial efficacy of Fufang Bingpeng irrigant: an in vitro study].
Shi Y; Yang J; Chen H
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 31(4):353-5. PubMed ID: 23991570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative antimicrobial analysis of various root canal irrigating solutions on endodontic pathogens: an in vitro study.
Misuriya A; Bhardwaj A; Bhardwaj A; Aggrawal S; Kumar PP; Gajjarepu S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 25095835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis, BioPure MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.
Arslan S; Ozbilge H; Kaya EG; Er O
Saudi Med J; 2011 May; 32(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 21556468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates.
Spratt DA; Pratten J; Wilson M; Gulabivala K
Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 11482142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro anti‑bacterial activity of diosgenin on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia.
Cong S; Tong Q; Peng Q; Shen T; Zhu X; Xu Y; Qi S
Mol Med Rep; 2020 Dec; 22(6):5392-5398. PubMed ID: 33174005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by cetrimide and chlorhexidine.
Arias-Moliz MT; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP; Valderrama MJ; Baca P
J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 20003941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
